Delhi High Court
68,862 judgments
MEHRACOSMETICS v. RAM KUMAR GULATI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'BLUE CHEF' due to prima facie passing off of plaintiff's prior unregistered trademark 'BLUE CHIEF', while allowing amendment of plaint and rejecting design infringement injunction for lack of novelty.
M/S Hargobind Fashions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State Bank of Patiala & Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition concerning banking disputes, directing the petitioners to seek remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal or Appellate Tribunal.
M/S ALKA ENTERPRISES & ORS. v. MOHD ZUBAIR
The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal and related criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by recording an amicable settlement with a binding payment schedule.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Suman and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for death in a motor accident but set aside the counsel fee and out-of-pocket expenses awarded without justification.
Khursheed Begum v. Nadeem Ur Rehman
The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings are not maintainable for enforcement of civil injunctions where alternate remedies under the Code of Civil Procedure exist, dismissing the contempt petition and directing the petitioners to pursue execution proceedings.
Rajesh Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that the lawful cancellation of a DDA flat allotment due to non-payment and failure of legal heirs to inform the authority of death or address change does not entitle them to mandatory allotment.
Pankaj Nagpal v. Majfish Tyagi
The Delhi High Court dismissed two criminal miscellaneous petitions for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to deposit court-ordered costs.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation-3) v. Rollys Royce Military Aero Engines Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals holding that interest under Section 234B is not leviable on payments deductible under Section 195 for assessment years prior to the 2012 amendment.
Manali Petrochemicals Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CESTAT must hear appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them due to pendency of writ petitions by others, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Central Warehousing Corporation
The Delhi High Court delivered judgment on a writ petition filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation against Central Warehousing Corporation concerning administrative matters.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Central Warehousing Corporation
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment on a writ petition filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation against Central Warehousing Corporation concerning an administrative dispute.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Central Warehousing Corporation
Judgment delivered by Delhi High Court in Writ Petition filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation against Central Warehousing Corporation on December 6, 2016.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Central Warehousing Corporation
The Delhi High Court reserved and delivered judgment in a writ petition filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation against Central Warehousing Corporation concerning administrative matters.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Central Warehousing Corporation
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment on a writ petition filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation against Central Warehousing Corporation concerning an administrative dispute.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Central Warehousing Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee who willfully suppresses facts in self-assessment of property tax is liable to pay interest under Section 152(2) of the Delhi Municipal Act, 1957, and the two-month grace period under Section 123-B(9) does not apply.
Future Link India v. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi II
The Delhi High Court allowed partial relief to a service tax assessee by modifying the mandatory 100% penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 to a reduced 25% penalty, granting time to pay the balance tax and interest, recognizing the appellant's bona fide ignorance but upholding the extended period invocation.
Jagdish v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court quashed NDMC's cancellation of street vending licences for lack of reasoned orders and violation of natural justice, emphasizing the necessity of fair hearing and cogent reasons in administrative decisions affecting livelihood.
Jagdish v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court quashed NDMC's cancellation of street vending licences for lack of reasoned orders and violation of natural justice, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned decisions affecting livelihood.
Samrat Ashok Private ITI v. Directorate General of Training (DGT)
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions by private ITIs seeking extension of admission deadlines for the 2016-17 session, holding that fixed training and examination schedules must be strictly adhered to and institutional delays do not justify extensions.