Delhi High Court
68,459 judgments
Kumud Gupta and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent department to respond to Ministry of Finance queries within three months regarding pay scale revision proposals but did not grant the pay scale relief sought by the petitioners.
Jasbir Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to pursue the case.
Arun Jain v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed criminal miscellaneous petitions for non-prosecution due to the petitioners' counsel repeatedly failing to appear on hearing dates.
Anurudh Prasad v. Radhey Shyam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, upholding the denial of leave to defend and eviction order on grounds identical to a previously dismissed petition.
Ram Awadh Yadav v. Radhey Shyam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, confirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and ownership under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing the tenant's revision petition challenging the eviction.
Narender Pandey v. Radhey Shyam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, upholding the dismissal of leave to defend and the eviction.
Ayush Kumar v. Radhey Shyam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the eviction order and dismissal of leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act, relying on identical grounds as a previously decided petition.
Shiv Shankar Mishra v. Radhey Shyam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging an eviction order under Section 25(B)(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, upholding the dismissal of leave to defend and the eviction.
Jagan Nath Lal v. Radhey Shyam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging an eviction order under Section 25(B)(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, upholding the dismissal of leave to defend and the eviction.
Parmod Kumar Pandey & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and restored the claim application by holding that delay in filing restoration applications must be condoned liberally to advance substantial justice unless caused by mala fide or gross negligence.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sarita & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to grant recovery rights against the vehicle owner whose minor son was driving at the time of the fatal accident.
Vinod Kumar v. M/S DTC
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition granting reinstatement without back wages to the petitioner, following the precedent set in DTC v. Ran Singh and DTC v. Prakash Chand.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jagroshni & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed structured fixed deposit disbursement of the balance motor accident compensation amount with court-imposed safeguards to protect the beneficiaries' interests.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Narender Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident claim award, upholding compensation for minor injuries and validating the driver's licence, thereby denying recovery rights.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sarita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal against a motor accident compensation award, upholding the quantum of compensation and rejecting the claim of a fake driving licence for recovery rights.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Parkash Chander and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for motor accident injuries as fair and allowed the insurer's recovery rights against third parties who failed to produce a driving licence.
Ramjee Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 7 of the Homoeopathy Central Council Act, directed timely elections within a reasonable period, and dismissed the petitioner’s challenge to the election notice for the Council’s President.
Prem Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to incomplete circumstantial evidence and doubts over DNA reliability, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Jatinder Kumar Sachdeva v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that Customs authorities cannot avoid statutory time limits for seizure by detaining goods and ordered release of a gold kara detained beyond the permissible period without issuance of a show cause notice.
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. v. SURENDER KUMAR & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld 50% contributory negligence on both parties in a motor accident, denied enhancement of compensation for injury, and allowed DTC to recover half the compensation paid to the injured from the car's insurer.