Delhi High Court

32,551 judgments

Year:

Krishan Kumar Wadhwa & Ors. v. Arjun Som Dutt & Ors.

01 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla · 2025:DHC:5054
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The court held that unilateral termination of a joint sale agreement before fulfillment of essential conditions is illegal, entitling the purchaser to refund of earnest money with interest and rejecting forfeiture claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Agreement to Sell earnest money mutation compulsory requirements

Atlas Logistic Pvt Ltd v. Jitendra Kumar

01 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5051-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the employer's appeal, holding that termination without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, entitling the employee to reinstatement with back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F retrenchment workman

Amar Singh v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.

01 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5050-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a flawed police constable bugler recruitment process due to improper selection board constitution and deviation from prescribed testing criteria, directing the petitioner’s appointment with notional benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Police recruitment Constable Bugler selection Board of Officers constitution Trade Test evaluation

B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr

01 Jul 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:5102
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the government cannot unilaterally amend a transfer scheme beyond the statutory time limits and set aside the order reallocating a property already vested in the petitioner company.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 Transfer Scheme Rules, 2001 transfer of assets removal of difficulties clause

M/S LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED v. RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED

01 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:5132
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting a contractor's claim for compensation due to employer-caused delay, affirming that contractual clauses limiting remedies to extension of time are binding if not challenged before the arbitral tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Contractual delay Extension of time

Manoj Kumar v. Sangeeta

01 Jul 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:5113

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of ad-interim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. but clarified it is payable from the date of the order, distinguishing ad-interim from interim maintenance and affirming the discretionary nature of such relief.

family appeal_dismissed Significant ad-interim maintenance interim maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance proceedings

DONG YANG PC, INC v. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS

01 Jul 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:5124

The Delhi High Court set aside the Controller's rejection of a patent application for a vertical rotary parking system, holding that the invention's inventive step and amendment rights require fresh consideration with due opportunity to the appellant.

intellectual_property remanded Significant inventive step patent application workshop modification amendment of specifications

Sub/Maj Hanuman Singh v. Union of India and Ors

01 Jul 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:112-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of disability pension with rounding off to 50% for Primary Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, holding that disabilities are presumed attributable to military service unless conclusively disproved by medical evidence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension military service Primary Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II

State Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Mujahid @ Laddu & Mehtab

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5183

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused in a robbery case due to failure of prosecution to prove identity and involvement beyond reasonable doubt amid material contradictions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery identity of accused benefit of doubt contradictions in evidence

GURDAYAL SINGH v. Arun Goel & Ors.

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5182

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the discharge of officials from criminal charges of forgery and conspiracy, holding no prima facie case was made out against them as they acted bona fide in their official capacity.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC Discharge order Forgery Conspiracy

Pradeep Gupta Trustee of Amar Nath Savitri Devi Memorial Trust v. Kamlesh Gupta Chairman/Trustee of Amar Nath Savitri Devi Memorial Trust

30 Jun 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5125
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously consider the petitioners' urgent application under Section 151 CPC seeking status quo over the Trust's bank account, without granting interim relief itself.

civil other Procedural Section 151 CPC interim relief status quo urgent application

Minor A v. State

30 Jun 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5095

The Delhi High Court allowed termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks for a minor rape victim, recognizing her constitutional right to bodily autonomy and grave mental trauma despite medical opinion against termination.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks sexual assault minor victim

Ranjan Oberoi v. State; Abdul Latif; Imran Latif; Zeeshan Latif

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5270

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging acquittal of respondents in a neighbourly scuffle case, holding that prosecution failed to prove offences under Sections 341, 323, and 509 IPC beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 341 IPC Section 323 IPC Section 509 IPC Acquittal

Sushil Kumar Saxena v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5455

The court dismissed the petition challenging the non-summoning of certain accused for forgery and cheating, holding that the petitioner’s resignation was not accepted and no prima facie case was made out against them.

criminal petition_dismissed resignation of director forgery summoning order Section 482 CrPC

Vijay Kumar Kataria v. Central Bureau of Investigation

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5158

Delhi High Court quashed supplementary chargesheet and summoning order against petitioner in cheating case where no prima facie offence under Section 420 IPC was made out and continuation of proceedings was abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 420 IPC Supplementary Chargesheet Closure Report

State of NCT of Delhi v. Arun Kumar; Imran @ Amit; Hemant @ Hanumant

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5269

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a robbery case, holding that delay in FIR registration, doubtful identification, and lack of recovery warranted benefit of doubt to accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant delay in FIR registration identification of accused benefit of doubt Test Identification Parade

Rizwan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5163

The Delhi High Court upheld the robbery convictions of Rizwan and Nadeem under Sections 392 and 397 IPC, affirming that threatening with a weapon constitutes 'use' under Section 397 IPC, while setting aside Nadeem's conviction under Section 411 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC use of deadly weapon

Anmol Rattan Bakshi v. Subhash Chand Rastogi

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5268

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 N.I. Act case, holding that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable loan and the accused successfully rebutted the presumption of liability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Presumption under Section 139 N.I. Act Legally enforceable debt

Rajiv Gupta v. The State of NCT; Ved Prakash Gupta

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5149

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. against Rajiv Gupta, holding that no deliberate falsehood was made in the affidavit and criminal proceedings should not be used to settle civil disputes.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 340 CrPC false affidavit interim lien civil dispute

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Priya Jain; Praveen Jain; Virender Kaushik

30 Jun 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5147

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of three accused in a forgery and conspiracy case, ruling that no prima facie evidence existed to proceed against them and expert opinion based on photocopies was inadmissible.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant criminal revision petition discharge of accused prima facie case forgery