Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
ICICI BANK LTD v. THASIM
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's petition to appoint a receiver to take possession of a hypothecated vehicle during a loan recovery suit, emphasizing the court's power under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC to protect secured creditors' interests.
ICICI BANK LTD v. MOHD. SOBI
Delhi High Court allowed petition to appoint a receiver over hypothecated vehicle in a bank recovery suit, clarifying the court's pragmatic approach and receiver's powers under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC.
ICICI BANK LTD v. NAUSHAD ALI
Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle to protect the bank's security in a loan recovery suit, emphasizing pragmatic exercise of powers under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC.
ICICI BANK LTD v. RAJARSHI GUHA
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle to protect the bank's security interest pending recovery proceedings, emphasizing a pragmatic approach under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC.
ICICI BANK LTD v. AMIT AGGARWAL & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle to protect the bank's security, affirming the court's power under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC to pragmatically safeguard public funds during loan recovery suits.
ICICI BANK LTD v. FAJAL ELAHI
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a receiver over a hypothecated vehicle securing a loan, emphasizing the court's power under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC to protect banks' interests during suit pendency.
Anju @ Ajay v. Yogesh Bansal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, upholding the Family Court's divorce decree on grounds of cruelty and desertion, emphasizing the importance of medical evidence and disproving false allegations.
Sharvan Kumar Goel v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused brothers in a suicide abetment case, considering the delayed production of the suicide note and prior settlement between parties.
TATA TELESERVICES v. ACHIEVERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court disposed of arbitration petitions due to non-service of respondents and directed the petitioner to ascertain correct addresses before seeking revival.
None v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed all miscellaneous applications filed by a non-party respondent in contempt proceedings for misusing the process and interfering with pending Income Tax appeals, emphasizing locus standi and proper scope of contempt proceedings.
M/S KEVENTER AGRO LIMITED v. M/S KALYAN VYPAR PVT. LTD. & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a written agreement to sell executed by an individual without authority cannot be enforced by the company purportedly represented by him under Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Arvind Kumar v. Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee
The Delhi High Court held that an employee transfer between schools under the same management is invalid without express service conditions permitting such transfer, despite maintenance of a common seniority list.
Prakash v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that mere pendency of criminal charges without conviction cannot justify cancellation of a candidate's appointment, especially when allegations against the candidate are vague and unsubstantiated.
Kewal Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging disciplinary removal from service, holding that unexplained delay and weak reasons do not justify condonation of delay in writ proceedings.
Modi-Mundipharma Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. Modi-Mundipharma Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956 for demerger of Modi-Mundipharma Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. into Modi-Mundipharma Pvt. Ltd., approving transfer of assets and liabilities effective from the appointed date.
Aon Services India Private Limited v. Aon Specialist Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a scheme of arrangement involving amalgamation and demerger among related companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring statutory compliance and absence of objections.
BUCON ENGINEERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD v. INDRAPRASTHA GAS LTD
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of the petitioner's appeal against a banning order and allowed interim consideration to enable participation in a public sector tender.
Banarsi Singh v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd to provide electricity connection to a tenant in possession despite an ownership dispute, without requiring a National Objection Certificate from the owner.
M/S Amira Pure Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Axis Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a bank's action, directing the parties to pursue their dispute through a pending civil suit.
Harish Chander Bhola v. Ankit Bajaj
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition for being identical to a previously dismissed petition involving the same parties and issues, emphasizing the principle against repetitive litigation.