Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ARB.P.·375/2016 ..... Petitioner TATA TELESERVICES
Through: Mr. Varrun Pandia with Ms. Shalini Prasad, Advocate
ARB.P.·375/2016 ..... Petitioner TATA TELESERVICES
Through: Mr. Varrun Pandia with Ms. Shalini Prasad, Advocate
VERSUS
ACHIEVERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent
Through: None
Through: None
ARB.P.376/2016
TATA TELESERVICES ..... Petitioner
TATA TELESERVICES ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
JCL TELESHOPPING ..... Respondent
ARB.P.377/2016
•
TATA TELESERVICES ..... Petitioner
•
TATA TELESERVICES ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
SKYLOGIC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED..... Respondent
.j/ ARB.P.379/2016 TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED ..... Petitioner
.j/ ARB.P.379/2016 TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
10f2 ARB.P. 375-37712016 & 379/2016 2017:DHC:8355
ACHIEVERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent
ACHIEVERS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
0/0 25.01.2017
ORDER
1. Despite three attempts, the Respondents have not been served. All the service reports have stated either that "addressee left" or "no such firm at the given address".
2. In that view of the matter, keeping these petitions pending will not serve any purpose. The Petitioner should make an effort to ascertain the correct present addresses of the Respondents and thereafter, apply to revive the prayers in these petitions.
3. The petitions are disposed of.
S.MURALIDHAR, J JANUARY 25, 20171P