Delhi High Court
61,796 judgments
Shahank Jain v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition directing the petitioner to pursue complaints before the Registrar Cooperative Societies as per the Financial Commissioner’s order and cautioned against withholding material information.
EKO India Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Sushil Kumar Yadav
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against the defendant's use of the deceptively similar mark 'EKO PAY' and directed transfer of the infringing domain name, affirming trademark infringement and passing off.
M.V. OMNI PROJECTS (I) LTD v. GAIL GAS LTD
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration proceedings should be confined to signatories of the arbitration agreement and non-signatory parties cannot be impleaded unless exceptional circumstances of composite transactions exist.
Micro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Small Industries Development Bank of India
The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to appeal against the DRT order without further deposit and maintained interim protection pending stay application disposal.
Krishan Lal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a suit for injunction by an appellant claiming adverse possession of government land, holding that injunction cannot be granted to a trespasser against the true owner without unimpeachable proof of adverse possession.
Sultan Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment or non-tender of compensation despite possession being taken.
Vinay Kumar v. Bijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 for abuse of process where the petitioner sought adjournments without stay and concealed material orders in a long-pending probate case involving disputed possession.
JAGDAMBA SALES CORPORATION v. DIRECTOR GENERAL (PRISONS)
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve contract disputes despite procedural irregularities in arbitration invocation.
Ashish Dutta v. M/s Adel Landmarks Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a service agreement where the respondent failed to file a reply or object.
Ajit Singh Mann v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by Ajit Singh Mann against the Union of India and others on 08.08.2017.
Ajit Singh Mann v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that non-payment of compensation under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act causes acquisition to lapse, and rightful owners or persons interested, even relying on unregistered documents, are entitled to relief.
Pushpa Devi & Ors. v. Ramesh Chander
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that a suit for injunction is not maintainable without possession and a suit for declaration challenging title documents filed beyond three years is barred by limitation.
HT Media Limited v. The Commissioner of Service Tax and Others & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the limitation bar under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act on the appellant's refund claim for excess service tax paid, dismissing the appeal.
Krishan Dev Bharal & Anr v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a registered Will after holding that the propounders proved its due execution, attestation, and the testator's sound mind, dismissing objections of fabrication and incapacity.
R.P.S. Panwar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld a departmental enquiry and penalty imposed on a government servant who abstained from participation, holding that ex parte findings based on unrebutted evidence and non-supply of UPSC advice prior to penalty imposed before 2011 do not vitiate the disciplinary action.
L N Malviya Infra Projects Pvt Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court set aside NHAI's order debarring Malviya, holding that its claim to experience under a disclosed joint venture was not fraudulent and blacklisting requires high proof of malafide conduct.
Manoj Sharma & Anr. v. Saroj Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim for a deceased pensioner by awarding loss to estate and other heads despite no loss of dependency, applying the multiplier method and relevant Supreme Court precedents.
Kunjan Sadana & Anr v. Mahesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation and interest awarded in a motor accident claim, applying Supreme Court benchmarks for non-pecuniary damages and increasing interest to 9% per annum.
Babli v. Sabbir
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by factoring future prospects, applying correct deductions for dependents, increasing non-pecuniary damages, and raising interest to 9% per annum.
Smt. Poonam Verma & Ors. v. Maj. Gen. N.L. Pandy & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages for a semi-skilled worker and increased the interest rate to 9% per annum.