Delhi High Court

61,796 judgments

Year:

Jawaharlal Nehru University v. Geeta Kumari

09 Aug 2017 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:3787
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that protests obstructing ingress and egress within 100 meters of JNU's Administrative Block violated its order and constituted contempt, balancing the right to protest with institutional discipline.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court peaceful protest Article 19(1)(a) administrative block

Helamtnimpex Private Ltd v. Helamin Technology Holding SA & Anr

08 Aug 2017 · Sanjiv Khanna; Navin Chawla · 2017:DHC:9047-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil appeals as withdrawn following the parties' settlement and their intention to file an application under Section 23 Rule 3 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal withdrawal settlement Section 23 Rule 3 CPC civil procedure

Vikram Nayar v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.

08 Aug 2017 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2017:DHC:8232

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner's arrest pursuant to a non-bailable warrant issued for contempt of court was lawful, dismissing his challenge to the arrest and enforcement of eviction orders.

civil petition_dismissed tenant eviction contempt of court non-bailable warrant court undertaking

Deepak @ Dany v. State

08 Aug 2017 · A. K. Pathak · 2017:DHC:8058

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from a trivial quarrel after the parties amicably settled their disputes voluntarily, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement cross FIRs

Bhupinder Chawla & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

08 Aug 2017 · A.K. Pathak · 2017:DHC:8057

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross-FIRs arising from a trivial family dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement cross-FIR

B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Precision Pipes and Profiles Co.

08 Aug 2017 · P.S. Teji · 2017:DHC:4314

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decision invalidating electricity demand based on unproven intermixing and fraudulent abstraction of energy while validating demand for excess connected load, dismissing the power supplier's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant electricity supply intermixing of connections fraudulent abstraction of energy connected load

Satbir Singh Sawhney v. Phoenix Arc Private Limited

08 Aug 2017 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2017:DHC:4315

The Delhi High Court held that limitation cannot be conclusively decided at the plaint rejection stage under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in loan recovery suits based on installment defaults, and the suit should proceed to trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation Order VII Rule 11 CPC loan recovery installment defaults

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. H.P. Cotton Textile Mills Ltd.

08 Aug 2017 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; S.P. GARG · 2017:DHC:4316-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging an arbitral award, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and upholding the Tribunal's loss assessment without depreciation on repair basis.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 arbitral award patent illegality

Deepak v. State of NCT of Delhi

08 Aug 2017 · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2017:DHC:4313

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn the appeal against conviction and sentence under multiple IPC sections after the appellant completed the substantive sentence and paid the fine.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 374 CrPC Section 377 IPC Section 367 IPC Section 323 IPC

Ravinder Sharma v. Border Security Force, Director General & Anr.

08 Aug 2017 · Sanjiv Khanna; Navin Chawla · 2017:DHC:4312-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a re-examination by a Review Medical Board where conflicting medical opinions existed on a candidate's fitness for BSF appointment, emphasizing procedural fairness and the possibility of error in initial medical findings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant medical examination Review Medical Board error of judgment medical fitness

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Krishna Prem & Ors.

08 Aug 2017 · R.K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:4295

The Delhi High Court modified compensation in a fatal motor accident claim by rejecting contributory negligence, adjusting future prospects and multiplier as per Sarla Verma, and enhancing non-pecuniary damages and interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence future prospects multiplier

Savitri Devi Pandey and Others v. Raj Kumari and Another

08 Aug 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:4296

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation and interest in a motor accident claim by correctly applying the Sarla Verma formula and held that insurers cannot deny interest by repudiating Lok Adalat awards without reviving proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects interest on compensation

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Subhash Sharma & Ors.

08 Aug 2017 · R.K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:4297

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's correction denying insurer's recovery rights where the vehicle owner had ensured the driver was competent and licensed.

civil petition_dismissed Significant motor accident claim insurance recovery rights competent driver clerical error correction

Dr. Kanwaljeet Singh v. Union of India

08 Aug 2017 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2017:DHC:4275

The Delhi High Court held that the appointing authority has discretion to recommend any candidate from a Search cum Selection Committee panel for Vice-Chancellor appointment, and deviation from the order of preference does not invalidate the appointment absent mala fide or statutory violation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Search cum Selection Committee order of preference Appointments Committee of the Cabinet Vice Chancellor appointment

Anguri Devi & Anr v. Union of India & Ors

08 Aug 2017 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; S.P. GARG · 2017:DHC:4292-DB

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, and mere deposit in treasury does not constitute payment.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013

Pratap Singh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

08 Aug 2017 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; S.P. GARG · 2017:DHC:4290-DB

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment of compensation and non-possession within five years, granting the petitioners a declaration of lapse.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition lapse of acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013

Udai Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Aug 2017 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; S.P. GARG · 2017:DHC:4287-DB

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid or tendered within five years, declaring the petitioners' land acquisition invalid due to non-payment.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) of 2013 Act compensation payment acquisition lapse

Office Equipment v. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd

08 Aug 2017 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2017:DHC:4289

The Delhi High Court upheld the forfeiture of the bid guarantee due to the appellant's failure to sign the contract and furnish the performance guarantee within the stipulated time and rejected the appellant's claim that the contract was only formed later.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contract formation absolute acceptance bid guarantee performance guarantee

Sanskriti School v. Directorate of Education (Act-I Branch)

08 Aug 2017 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2017:DHC:4293-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant school's stay application due to delay but allowed filing a fresh application to be decided on merits regarding fee regulation compliance.

administrative appeal_dismissed interim relief delay in filing Depreciation Reserve Fund development fee

Balbir Singh Chhachhia v. UIO & Ors.

08 Aug 2017 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2017:DHC:4291-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous following the disposal of connected petitions and absence of any surviving issue for adjudication.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition connected petitions sine die adjournment petition disposal