Delhi High Court
61,796 judgments
A.A.DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL INDIA FUND LLC v. BARFLEX POLYFILMS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension for the arbitral tribunal to make its award under Section 29A(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, as proceedings were ongoing without delay.
Shamik Nag v. The Public Information Officer, Oriental Bank of Commerce and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the CIC cannot direct disclosure of information in complaints under Section 18 of the RTI Act but may impose penalties after inquiry, and directed respondents to provide outstanding information to the petitioner.
VIDYUT CGHS LTD. v. ANIL KUMAR MEHTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to condone delay in filing an appeal against an ex-parte award, holding that the petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for the delay beyond the statutory limitation period.
Soril Infra Resources Limited v. M/S. Annapurna Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding a tenant liable for rent and damages due to invalid termination notice not served on current owners and wrongful occupation during the lock-in period.
Usha Rastogi v. Nisha Rastogi
The Delhi High Court upheld possession and injunction decrees against the appellant, ruling that a proved security agreement cannot be contradicted as an agreement to sell and that unregistered agreements do not confer protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act.
Sanjeev Narula v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a consent arbitral award transferring mortgaged property title is enforceable, but possession claims require separate suit as execution is not the proper remedy.
D.N. Kadian v. Lieutenant Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suspension period cannot be regularized as duty period and pension benefits withheld pending judicial proceedings unless suspension is found wholly unjustified.
Zabun Nisa v. Mohd. Afzal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for pain and suffering and loss of amenities of life in a motor accident claim involving permanent disability and awarded interest on the enhanced amount.
Virender Kumar v. Mool Chand Shripal Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for recovery of outstanding fuel dues against a transporter, holding that the security cheque was validly presented and the suit was not barred by limitation.
Rajesh Sharma v. M/S. FIITJEE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a suit for recovery of service dues, holding that the dispute was covered by a valid arbitration clause mandating reference to arbitration.
Veenakshi Sharma v. Meera Devi Vasudev
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the appellate court's decree for possession and mesne profits, holding that an unregistered MOU and unproven power of attorney cannot create enforceable rights in immovable property.
Neetu Singh v. Rajiv Saumitra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff author, not the company where she was Director, owns the copyright in educational books authored by her, granting interim injunction against defendants for copyright infringement.
M/S Aggarwal Brothers v. Shama Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s revision petition challenging eviction, holding that summons were duly served on the tenant’s agent, denial of service was false and an abuse of process, and the eviction petition was maintainable under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Rajiv Chandrakant Shah v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the magistrate's prima facie finding and the Central Government's order to extradite Rajiv Chandrakant Shah to the USA for bank fraud conspiracy, dismissing his writ petition.
Sunny v. Lieutenant Governor of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an externment order against the petitioner for lack of sufficient material to deem him a habitual offender and absence of emergent necessity, emphasizing procedural compliance and reasonableness.
Sajidur Rehman v. Rajiv Kashyap
The Delhi High Court acquitted the petitioner in a cheque bounce case by holding that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act was successfully rebutted due to lack of proof of a legally enforceable debt.
Manvender Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the petitioner's conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death but granted probation, suspending the sentence considering mitigating factors and the reformatory aspect of punishment.
Roop Kishore @ Bobby v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for attempted murder and criminal intimidation, emphasizing the reliability of injured witnesses' testimony despite minor procedural lapses.
Asif Ali Khan @ Sufiyan Ali v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of robbery and related charges due to unreliable identification and lack of direct evidence linking them to the crime.
KRBL LTD v. LAL MAHAL LTD AND ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to summon limited additional witnesses after delay during trial, balancing procedural timelines with the interest of justice and imposing costs for the delay.