Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Monbir @ Monu & Ors. v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.

16 Jul 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:5686

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would not serve the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Sections 498A, 406 IPC matrimonial dispute

Kothari Shaileshbhai Ramanlal HUF v. Samaksh Jain

16 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5753

The Delhi High Court restored the petitioner’s right to be examined in person after recovery from ill-health, setting aside the Trial Court’s order closing his right to lead evidence and directing a suitable date for deposition.

civil appeal_allowed Local Commissioner Examination of witness Right to lead evidence Trial Court discretion

Union of India & Ors. v. GP Capt Girish Kumar Johri (Retd.)

16 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5716-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force officer with lifestyle diseases, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the employer's burden to disprove service attribution.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Primary Hypertension

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Sgt Kunal Palit

16 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5717-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type II, affirming the presumption that such disease is attributable to military service unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type II armed forces Release Medical Board

Hans Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

16 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathanshankar

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellants of murder charges due to unreliability of the sole eyewitness testimony and failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sole eyewitness testimony related witness reliability of evidence murder conviction

Dr Rashmi Jain v. Union of India

16 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5725-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The petitioner withdrew her writ petition after her transfer posting was changed from Imphal to Guwahati, leading to disposal of the petition by the High Court.

administrative other writ petition transfer posting withdrawal of petition administrative transfer

Union of India v. HFO Ratnakar Mahala Retd

16 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service attributable unless the employer disproves it, and clarified the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction in such matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Tahir Shoib @ Shoib Malik v. The State (NCT of Delhi) through SHO of Police

16 Jul 2025 · Shalinder Kaur, J · 2025:DHC:5694

Delhi High Court dismissed bail application of accused involved in printing and circulation of fake currency, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and rejecting parity with co-accused granted statutory bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Fake Indian Currency Notes Bail under Section 439 CrPC Economic offences Counterfeiting

Sudheesh C Anand & Anr. v. Jia Ram Anand & Anr.

16 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5750

The Delhi High Court directed the executing court to prioritize and promptly dispose of a long-pending execution petition and related application without expressing any opinion on the jurisdictional merits.

civil other Procedural execution petition judgment debtor jurisdiction Delhi Courts

M/S ARORA H/W AND PAINT STORE v. M/S JAWAHAR CHIT P LTD

16 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5751

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the executing court's rejection of objections already decided in a prior appeal, upholding the finality of the decree and refusing to interfere under supervisory jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed execution proceedings Order XXI Rule 58 Indian Evidence Act Section 44 supervisory jurisdiction

Raj Kumar v. Kanahiya Lal and Anr.

16 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5752
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's order dismissing the application challenging service of summons, holding that failure to examine material witnesses justified an adverse inference and ex parte proceeding.

civil appeal_dismissed Order IX Rule 13 CPC service of summons process server adverse inference

Sonam Kaushik v. Comptroller and Auditor General of India

16 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5667-DB

The Delhi High Court extended interim status quo against the petitioner's repatriation pending final hearing before the Central Administrative Tribunal without expressing any opinion on merits.

administrative appeal_dismissed interim relief status quo Central Administrative Tribunal repatriation

Union of India & Ors. v. Bhoj Raj Singh

16 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5759-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attributability to military service and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II armed forces attributability

M/S EKAM CHEMICALS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

16 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5760-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of personal hearing where the Show Cause Notice was uploaded only on a less visible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab natural justice

M/S BENETT COLEMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED v. SACHIN KUMAR & ORS

16 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2013 (139) DRJ 157

The High Court set aside the trial court's order dismissing the limitation plea in a defamation suit and remanded the matter for fresh examination of limitation and jurisdiction issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation defamation Order VII Rule 11 CPC Article 75 Limitation Act

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Meenu Rani

16 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5698-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the termination of a transport corporation employee for strike participation due to lack of proper inquiry and violation of natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant termination of service natural justice disciplinary inquiry strike participation

Ravinder Kumar v. Directorate General Border Security Force & Anr.

16 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5865-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant cannot withdraw an accepted resignation unless all conditions under the relevant service rules are met, and mere uncertainty in alternate employment does not constitute a material change in circumstances.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant resignation withdrawal government service Central Civil Services Rules material change in circumstances

Delhi Jal Board v. Sanjay Makkar

16 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5669-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court extended the time for the appellant to deposit the awarded amount to maintain the stay on the Industrial Award, emphasizing that no further extensions would be granted.

civil appeal_allowed Industrial Award Stay Deposit of awarded amount Extension of time

Delhi Jal Board v. Harpal Singh

16 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5670-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal condoning a 49-day delay in deposit of an Industrial Award amount on administrative grounds, granting a conditional stay on execution upon deposit within ten days.

civil appeal_allowed condonation of delay Industrial Award deposit of awarded amount stay of execution

Delhi Jal Board v. Bhupendra Singh Pal

16 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5671-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conditional stay of an Industrial Award requiring deposit of the awarded amount, granted a limited extension for compliance, and dismissed the appeal challenging the stay order.

civil appeal_dismissed Industrial Award stay of execution deposit of awarded amount extension of time