Sudheesh C Anand & Anr. v. Jia Ram Anand & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 16 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:5750
Manoj Jain
CM(M) 1228/2025
2025:DHC:5750
civil other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the executing court to prioritize and promptly dispose of a long-pending execution petition and related application without expressing any opinion on the jurisdictional merits.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 1228/2025 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 16th July, 2025
CM(M) 1228/2025 & CM APPL. 41448-41449/2025
SUDHEESH C ANAND & ANR. .....Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person.
VERSUS
JIA RAM ANAND & ANR. .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by Mr. Sudheesh C Anand, who is judgment debtor No.1 before the learned Executing Court.

2. It seems that the grievance of the judgment debtor No.1/petitioner is, merely, to the effect that the execution is pending for quite some time and has not been so far disposed of despite the fact that he has already apprised the learned Executing Court on various previous occasions that since he does not have any movable or immovable property situated within the jurisdiction of Delhi Courts, the execution at Delhi could not have been proceeded but his such contention has yet not been answered.

3. The petitioner is, reportedly, an octogenarian and, merely, seeks that the abovesaid aspect may be considered by the learned Executing Court as expeditiously as possible.

4. The next date before the learned Executing Court is stated to be 29.08.2025. CM(M) 1228/2025 2

5. The execution petition was filed way back in the year 2018.

6. Keeping in mind the overall facts of the case and after hearing the petitioner, who appears in person, the present petition is disposed of with request to the learned Executing Court to give top most priority to the abovesaid Execution Petition and to dispose of application filed by the judgment debtor, without any further delay.

7. It is, however, clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion with respect to the merits of the contention raised by the petitioner herein and it will be entirely upto the learned Trial Court to take decision, in accordance with law.

8. Pending applications also stand disposed of in aforesaid terms.

JUDGE JULY 16, 2025/ss/js