Delhi High Court

64,846 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7622-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, holding that duty drawback amounts had not accrued and were not taxable income for assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant duty drawback accrual of income taxable income Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7621-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, holding that duty drawback amounts had not accrued or become payable and thus were not includible in the taxable income of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. for AY 1995-96 and 1996-97.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant duty drawback accrual of income taxable income Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7620-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified the applicability of Section 43B for including customs duty in closing stock valuation, upheld several deletions of disallowances, and affirmed taxability principles relating to inter-corporate deposits and Section 80HHC deductions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 43B Income Tax Act customs duty closing stock valuation Section 14A disallowance

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7615-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that duty drawback not accrued or payable cannot be included in the assessee's taxable income.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant duty drawback taxable income accrual of income Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7616-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that duty drawback amounts not accrued or payable cannot be included in taxable income for the relevant assessment years.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant duty drawback taxable income income accrual Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7609-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order rejecting the Revenue's addition of Rs. 643.34 crore for excessive raw material consumption and ruled that the duty drawback amount was not includible in taxable income, while clarifying the scope of remand orders and appellate jurisdiction.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Assessing Officer jurisdiction Excessive consumption addition RG-23 Part-II register

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7610-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's deletion of a substantial addition made on account of alleged excess consumption of raw materials by the assessee.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Appellate Tribunal addition to income excess consumption raw materials

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7611-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that payments to non-resident agents operating outside India do not attract TDS deduction under Section 195(1), and such payments cannot be disallowed under Section 40(a)(i), dismissing the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT order in favour of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 195(1) Section 40(a)(i) TDS deduction

Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7608-DB

The Delhi High Court partly allowed Maruti Udyog Ltd.'s appeal by permitting certain excise duty deposits and software expenditure as allowable deductions while upholding disallowance of unutilized MODVAT credit and sales tax recoverable under Section 43B.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Personal Ledger Account MODVAT credit Section 43B Income Tax Act software expenditure

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7617-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified the timing of duty drawback accrual, treatment of MODVAT credit under Section 43B, and the interplay of deductions under Sections 80-IB and 80HHC in income tax assessments for AY 2004-05.

tax appeal_allowed Significant duty drawback MODVAT credit Section 43B Section 80-IB

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 v. MARUTI UDYOG LTD.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7618-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's cancellation of additions related to custom duty and sales tax exemptions by affirming their capital nature and excluding them from taxable income.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant custom duty imported components export purposes closing stock

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7619-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's rulings allowing deductions under Section 43B for various payments, clarified the onus under Section 14A lies on Revenue, and rejected Revenue's appeal except on the MODVAT credit issue.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 43B Income Tax Act Section 14A Income Tax Act MODVAT credit customs duty

Sushant Kumar Dass v. State

07 Dec 2017 · Mukta Gupta · 2017:DHC:7658

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence for attempt to murder under Sections 452 and 307 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite the appellant's challenge to the reliability of prosecution witnesses and weapon classification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 307 IPC Section 452 IPC Attempt to murder Grievous injury

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7625-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's deletion of Custom Duty addition under section 43B of the Income Tax Act for components imported and used for export.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 43B Custom Duty Import of components

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

07 Dec 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:7624-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions relating to custom duty and sales tax subsidy, ruling in favor of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Appellate Tribunal custom duty sales tax subsidy revenue receipt

Jai Prakash v. Shiv Steel & Anr

06 Dec 2017 · Siddharth Mridul; Deepa Sharma · 2017:DHC:9076-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and condonation application, holding that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient cause for non-appearance and delay in seeking restoration of a writ petition dismissed in default.

civil appeal_dismissed restoration of writ petition condonation of delay dismissal in default Limitation Act 1963

Balaji International v. Thukral Steel Corporation

06 Dec 2017 · Najmi Waziri · 2017:DHC:8312

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions in cheque bounce cases, setting aside convictions upon full payment and compounding the offence with costs as per Supreme Court guidelines.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cheque dishonour compounding of offence Negotiable Instruments Act Damodar S Prabhu

Yogesh Sharma & Ors v. State & Ors

06 Dec 2017 · A.K. Pathak · 2017:DHC:8268

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from landlord-tenant disputes based on an amicable settlement and the complainants' unwillingness to proceed, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement landlord-tenant dispute

ATC Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited v. Reliance Communications Limited & Anr.

06 Dec 2017 · Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:7574

The Delhi High Court held that under the Scheme of Arrangement, the transferee company is prima facie liable to secure the petitioner's outstanding dues arising from transferred telecom infrastructure contracts and granted interim relief accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant Scheme of Arrangement Sections 391-394 Companies Act, 1956 Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Master Services Agreement

New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nishant Parveen & Ors.

06 Dec 2017 · Sunil Gaur · 2017:DHC:7569
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by relying on unchallenged income tax returns and applying Supreme Court guidelines on future prospects and non-pecuniary damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of income future prospects income tax returns