Delhi High Court
64,846 judgments
Alstom T & D India Ltd v. M/S Aradhya Infra-Tech Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting the respondent's claims and held that liquidated damages require proof of actual loss, dismissing the petition challenging the award.
Suresh Chander v. Sabir Ali
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging civil court jurisdiction over Wakf Board property and directed that dispossession must follow due process of law.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Raj Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim due to increased disability and held the insurer entitled to recover the amount from the driver and owner for breach of insurance policy conditions.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Raj Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim following amputation and held the insurer liable to pay but entitled to recover from the driver and owner due to breach of insurance policy conditions.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Lalita and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer must pay compensation despite breach of policy terms due to invalid driving licence but is entitled to recover from the driver and owner, while adjusting damages and interest in line with Supreme Court rulings.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Lalita and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation despite policy breach but granted it recovery rights against the driver and owner, while adjusting damages and interest in line with Supreme Court rulings.
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Amarjeet Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified compensation in a motor accident claim by recalculating disability and future prospects, enhanced general damages, and remanded insurer's breach of policy plea for fresh adjudication.
R.L.TRADERS v. Income Tax Officer Ward 47(1)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the addition of unexplained cash credits under Section 68 and the consequent penalty under Section 271 of the Income Tax Act, despite absence of cross-examination of the creditor.
HIMALYA INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. HIMALAYA DRUGS COMPANY
The Delhi High Court dismissed a premature suit for damages for a wrongful injunction, holding that such claims must await the final decision in the original suit where the injunction was granted.
M/S M.U EATING POINT & ANR. v. CAPT. AMAN AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiffs are the rightful owners of the registered trademark "TUNDAY KABABI" and granted an ex-parte injunction against defendants using the deceptively similar mark "LUCKNOW WALE TUNDAY KABABI" for trademark infringement.
A J v. S P
The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful settlement resolving all matrimonial claims including maintenance, custody, and property, and disposed of the pending appeal accordingly.
Vinod Bangwal v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a criminal case involving forgery and conspiracy to usurp property, holding that the serious nature of offences and active role of accused justified denial of bail.
Ravinder Kumar Jatav v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner alleged to be the mastermind of a bank fraud, holding that bail should be denied at the preliminary investigation stage when custodial interrogation is necessary.
Sanjay Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the accused in a serious sexual harassment and criminal intimidation case, emphasizing the need to protect the investigation and prevent tampering or intimidation.
Wajid Khan v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court refused anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of kidnapping and related non-compoundable offences, holding that bail is not warranted at the preliminary investigation stage despite a reported compromise.
M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED v. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a rehabilitation scheme under SICA is not binding on a State without its consent, and a petitioner is not entitled to refund of VAT and Electricity Duty paid despite exemption provisions, as refund claims lie outside BIFR jurisdiction and are barred by unjust enrichment and limitation.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the ITAT's deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that penalty is not warranted where the issue is debatable.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that duty drawback amounts not accrued or payable cannot be included in the taxable income of the assessee.
Sunbeam Auto Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that sales tax subsidy is a capital receipt, set aside the revenue's assessment orders treating it as revenue receipt, and allowed the petitioner's revision application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act.
Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that amounts deposited in the Central Excise Personal Ledger Account are deductible under Section 43B as actual payment of excise duty liability, but unutilized MODVAT credit balances are not deductible until utilized.