Delhi High Court
65,510 judgments
Balwanti Devi and Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court within five years prior to the Act's commencement, and deposit in government treasury is not equivalent to payment.
Ajis India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of Ajis India Private Limited under Section 497 of the Companies Act, 1956 after finding all statutory compliances fulfilled.
Union of India and Anr. v. Dr. B N Mittal
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed against a deceased respondent without impleading legal heirs, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file afresh after disposal of a pending Review Application before the Tribunal.
J.C. Bamford Excavators Limited & Anr. v. Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit alleging infringement of registered designs and copyright in technical drawings is maintainable despite withdrawal of interim relief and prior admissions, with key issues requiring trial.
Jasmeet Kaur v. Navtej Singh
The Delhi High Court held that anti-suit injunctions arising out of marital disputes and relating to custody fall exclusively within the Family Court's jurisdiction under the Family Courts Act, 1984, and transferred the suit accordingly.
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Jyoti Structures Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a clerical error in its order under Sections 152 and 151 CPC to reflect the true intention of the court.
Sushil Arora v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals of Sushil Arora and Rajesh Pandey while dismissing others, affirming principles on conviction standards and sentencing modifications in criminal appeals.
Toleti Sreenivasakalyanan Chakravarthy and Anr. v. Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed disqualified directors to withdraw their petitions with liberty to avail the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, permitting temporary activation of DINs and setting conditions for participation even if their companies were struck off.
Rajesh Ahuja v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking clarification on the CODS-2018, clarifying that no fresh prosecution arises against directors who avail of the scheme under Section 167(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.
SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DIGITAL CABLE NETWORK
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff music company against a cable network for unauthorized broadcasting of copyrighted works without license.
Wimpy International Ltd. v. Gulshan Dhingra
The Delhi High Court held that a suit based on an open, mutual, and current account with shifting balances is within limitation and maintainable by a sole proprietor who took over a partnership firm's liabilities.
Minakshi Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to consider the petitioner’s representation for promotion to PGT (English) based on her valid qualification and pass a speaking order, without deciding the merits.
Neelima Kapoor v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation for recalculation of gratuity based on full service period and mandated the respondent school to decide it within a fixed timeframe in accordance with statutory provisions.
Mahesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The High Court dismissed the petition to transfer a dowry harassment case from a Magistrate to a Sessions Court for simultaneous trial with a murder case, but ordered transfer within the same court complex for convenience.
Dr. Sanjeev Kumar v. Medical Council of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Medical Council of India to decide the petitioner's Representation within a stipulated timeframe with Oversight Committee approval, maintaining status quo on service conditions meanwhile.
Sahil Singh Ravish v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the University's mandatory 70% attendance rule for examinations, dismissing the appeal of a student whose results were withheld for non-compliance, while ordering a refund of fees.
Anil Kumar Ahuja v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the writ petition challenging partial implementation of a transfer order to be decided expeditiously by the Central Administrative Tribunal, recognizing the issue of equivalence of posts as a service matter within the tribunal's jurisdiction.
KSC CONSTRUCTION CO. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the arbitration agreement, holding that the court’s role under Section 11(6A) is limited to verifying the existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving disputes on arbitrability and merits to the arbitral tribunal.
NIIT Technologies Limited v. Directorate General, Border Security Force
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after the respondent failed to appoint one within a reasonable time, rejecting restrictive contractual clauses that would frustrate arbitration.
Harkirat Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse if neither possession is taken nor compensation paid within the prescribed period under Section 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, relying on Supreme Court precedents.