Full Text
Translation output
$ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.A. 1284/2015
SUSHIL ARORA Appellant
Through: Mr. Vikas Arora and Ms. Radhika Arora, Advs.
CRL.A. 1284/2015
SUSHIL ARORA Appellant
Through: Mr. Vikas Arora and Ms. Radhika Arora, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State
Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State
CRL.A. 53/2016
RAJESH PANDEY Appellant
Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashim Shridhar and Ms. Prachi Gupta, Advs.
RAJESH PANDEY Appellant
Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashim Shridhar and Ms. Prachi Gupta, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent the State
CRL.A. 190/2016
HEMANT GARG Appellant
Through: Mr. K. Singhal with Mr.Prasanna, Advs.
HEMANT GARG Appellant
Through: Mr. K. Singhal with Mr.Prasanna, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent
Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. page 1of3
2017:DHC:9123-DB
Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. page 1of3
2017:DHC:9123-DB
CRL.A. 1338/2015
VISHNU 5/0 PANCHU RAM Appellant
Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advs.
VISHNU 5/0 PANCHU RAM Appellant
Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent the State
CRL.A. 283/2016
SONVEER alias PINKU Appellant
Through: Mr. Rajeev Mohan, Adv.
SONVEER alias PINKU Appellant
Through: Mr. Rajeev Mohan, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA
19.12.2017 Per majority opinion of Gita Mittal, J & Sanjiv Khanna, J, Crl.A. 1284/2015 Sushi! Arora v. State and CrLA.53/2016 Rajesh
Pandey v. State are allowed.
Per majority opinion of R.K. Gauba, J & Sanjiv Khanna, J, Cr!.A.1338/2015 Vishnu S/o Panchu Ram v. NCT of Delhi, Crl.A190/2016 Hemant Garg v. State NCT of Delhi and
Crl.A. 283/2016 Sonveer alias Pinku v. Slate are dismissed.
Orders on sentence shall stand modified in terms of majority
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA
19.12.2017 Per majority opinion of Gita Mittal, J & Sanjiv Khanna, J, Crl.A. 1284/2015 Sushi! Arora v. State and CrLA.53/2016 Rajesh
Pandey v. State are allowed.
Per majority opinion of R.K. Gauba, J & Sanjiv Khanna, J, Cr!.A.1338/2015 Vishnu S/o Panchu Ram v. NCT of Delhi, Crl.A190/2016 Hemant Garg v. State NCT of Delhi and
Crl.A. 283/2016 Sonveer alias Pinku v. Slate are dismissed.
Orders on sentence shall stand modified in terms of majority
ORDER
in these three appeals.
AC NGCuiSTICE SANJIV KIIANNA, J C R.K. GAU1 ,J
DECEMBER 19, 2017 /
AC NGCuiSTICE SANJIV KIIANNA, J C R.K. GAU1 ,J
DECEMBER 19, 2017 /