Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Rajesh Agarwal
The Delhi High Court held that a Local Commissioner's report is admissible evidence without examination and that a trademark proprietor and its affiliates form one economic entity entitled to protection without assignment, allowing the appeal and granting permanent injunction against trademark infringement.
JPC Infrastructure and Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Alstom Systems India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator as premature since the petitioner failed to follow the agreed ICC arbitration appointment procedure before approaching the court.
Vir Sanghvi v. Outlook Media Private Limited & Others
The High Court set aside the adjournment of a defamation complaint pending due to sealed tape evidence, directing the trial to proceed using copies available with investigative agencies.
Anand Kumar & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a minor road accident and scuffle after the parties amicably settled their disputes and agreed not to prosecute.
Tarun Kapoor & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Ashok Kumar Singhal v. Bimla Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's review application against an order directing him to vacate disputed premises, holding that prior admissions on oath estopped him from denying the respondent's ownership.
Manu Kumaran & Anr v. Central Board of Film Certification & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the refusal of film certification for "Battle of Banaras," affirming filmmakers' constitutional right to portray social realities and directing re-examination with specific reference to certification guidelines.
M.L.GUPTA v. M/S. AERENS GOLD SOUK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court granted a part decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for repayment of admitted sums received by defendants as alleged loans, minus forfeitable earnest money under a disputed Agreement to Sell, with interest at 18% per annum.
Gamesh Mathur & Ors. v. Prem alias Premvati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance directing Defendant No. 3 to transfer her share in the suit land upon payment of the balance sale consideration plus an additional amount, due to her breach of the Agreement to Sell.
Manjit Chawla & Anr v. Sapna alias Vasundhra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that oral family arrangements and oral relinquishment of immovable property shares are not enforceable without all legal heirs' consent and evidence, granting plaintiffs one-third share in the partition suit properties.
Jyoti Puri v. Pawan Gandhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the Wills executed by the deceased parents, dismissing the Plaintiff's claim for partition and share in the property, holding that the property devolved solely to the two brothers as per the Wills.
R.S. Dahiya v. State (Through NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of police officers for custodial death, ruling that addition of murder charge without fresh sanction was valid and refusal to recall witnesses was justified as the request was vexatious.
M/S THREE-N-PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S KAIRALI EXPORTS AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that the generic term "AYUR" does not confer exclusive trademark rights and refused injunction against the defendants' use of the composite mark "AYURVASTRA."
M/S CASTROL LIMITED & ANR. v. IQBAL SINGH CHAWLA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants’ use of ‘LUMAX ACTIVE’ with identical trade dress infringed plaintiffs’ registered trademark ‘ACTIV’, copyright, and amounted to passing off, granting permanent injunction and damages.
IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. S & D HOSPITALITY
Delhi High Court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction over a trademark infringement suit based on defendant's website accessibility, emphasizing the need for purposeful availment and real commercial transactions within the forum state.
Mehtab v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for voluntarily causing hurt and causing hurt with a sharp weapon based on reliable eyewitness identification and corroborative evidence, while modifying the sentence to the period already served.
Sunder v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Sections 308/34 and 427/34 IPC, holding that common intention and injured witness identification suffice to sustain conviction despite some witnesses resiling.
Abdul v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction under Sections 394/34 IPC, holding that minor contradictions in the injured witness's testimony did not create reasonable doubt when corroborated by medical evidence and other material.
Dayanand Rajan & Anr. v. Ram Lal Khattar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the appellant's claim that the suit property was HUF property, affirming that post-1956 inheritance does not create HUF property without clear proof of HUF existence or property thrown into common hotchpotch.
Vijay Pal Singh v. Usman Gani Ansari
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court decree holding the appellant personally liable under a written settlement agreement and dismissed the appeal challenging recovery of Rs.3,50,000.