Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Santosh @ Ravi v. State; Manoj Kumar v. State
The High Court acquitted appellants of armed robbery charges due to serious lacunae in prosecution evidence, including non-examination of a key eyewitness and non-production of recovered weapons.
Santosh @ Ravi v. State; Manoj Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in an armed robbery case due to failure of prosecution to establish identity and prove use of deadly weapons beyond reasonable doubt, highlighting the importance of corroborative evidence and proper investigation.
M/S K. S. ROADLINES AND ORS. v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that BPCL must first exhaust additional LPG tank trucks offered by original successful bidders before inducting third-party trucks under an ad-hoc notice, ensuring adherence to tender terms and fairness.
State v. Ravi Kapoor & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentences of two accused for the abduction, robbery, and murder of Jigisha Ghosh based on reliable circumstantial evidence and affirmed the admissibility of specimen handwriting without prior court permission.
DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LIMITED v. ALOK MEHNDIRATTA & ORS.
Delhi High Court upheld injunction restraining Delhi Gymkhana Club from granting permanent membership out of turn to UCP/Green Card Holders, holding such practice contrary to the Club's Articles of Association.
DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LIMITED v. ALOK MEHNDIRATTA & ORS.
Delhi High Court upheld interim injunction restraining Delhi Gymkhana Club from granting out-of-turn permanent memberships to dependent children (UCPs) contrary to its Articles of Association, dismissing the Club's appeals and petition.
Delhi Gymkhana Club Limited v. Alok Mehndiratta & Ors.
Delhi High Court upheld interim injunction restraining Delhi Gymkhana Club from granting out of turn permanent memberships to UCPs/Green Card Holders pending trial, holding such practice contrary to the Club's Articles of Association.
Anil Kataria v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to incomplete circumstantial evidence and failure of the prosecution to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing strict adherence to the charge-sheet and the necessity of a complete chain of circumstances.
General Manager Uttarakhand Parivhan Nigam v. Tejpal
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of negligence against the Uttarakhand Roadways bus driver in a fatal accident and applied established principles to enhance compensation in certain death claims involving minors.
General Manager Uttarakhand Parivhan Nigam v. Tejpal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of negligence against the Uttarakhand Roadways bus driver in a fatal accident and enhanced compensation awards in death claims applying established principles of motor accident compensation.
General Manager Uttarakhand Parivhan Nigam v. Tejpal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of negligence against the Uttarakhand Roadways bus driver and confirmed liability for compensation, enhancing awards in certain death cases based on established principles for minors.
POWER GRID CORPN.OF INDIA LTD. v. KARNATAKA POWER TRANS. CORP. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CERC's order restricting its review power and disallowed the appellant's claim for Interest During Construction due to lack of evidence of project delay.
Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C v. Bird Worldwide Flight Services India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the addition of the insurer as a second defendant in a suit for aircraft damage, holding that such addition does not prejudice the plaintiff and that insurer and insured may be jointly liable.
Arun Agarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings under Sections 120B, 406, 420, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent.
Kausariram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Custodian's order recalling an earlier order under the Enemy Property Act for lack of natural justice, directing that any review must be preceded by notice and hearing.
Atul Mehra and Anr v. Land and Development Office and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions following a respondent's letter promising compliance, and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
Braham Prakash Yadav and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken, interpreting 'paid' compensation to require tender and deposit in court as per the 1894 Act.
Rasiied Ahmed v. UOI and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging the Custodian's order vesting enemy property, as the order was withdrawn in a related proceeding, rendering the challenge infructuous.
Emami Power Limited v. NTPC Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside NTPC's encashment of bank guarantees and MNRE's blacklisting of petitioners for alleged fraudulent bidding, holding that such punitive actions require adherence to natural justice and proof of wrongful gain or loss.
Emami Power Limited v. NTPC Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside NTPC's encashment of bank guarantees and MNRE's blacklisting of petitioners for alleged fraudulent bidding, holding that natural justice was violated and no material established fraud or loss.