Delhi High Court

65,687 judgments

Year:

Ebnam Ali @ Lala Khan v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

08 Jan 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:152-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a murder and abduction case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in light of contradictory medical evidence and unreliable witness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abduction murder Section 364 IPC Section 302 IPC

M/S LYCA FINANCE LTD v. A.K SALUJA

08 Jan 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:169

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide need for residential use under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing tenant's plea for leave to defend.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide need eviction

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/S PKSS Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

08 Jan 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:182

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, upholding nominal damages, interest awards, and costs granted to the contractor for breach of contract by the municipal corporation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge nominal damages breach of contract

MAPEX Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India

08 Jan 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:181

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting MAPEX’s claims for prolongation and change of law costs while rejecting EPC Contractor’s claims due to lack of subcontract evidence, affirming that damages under Section 73 of the Contract Act are independent of contractual bonus/penalty provisions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 73 Indian Contract Act EPC Contractor claims

National Highways Authority of India v. Mapex Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

08 Jan 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:180

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting MAPEX damages for delay attributable to NHAI while rejecting EPC contractor claims for lack of contractual proof, clarifying that subcontractor claims can be pursued through the main contractor in arbitration if supported by contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 73 Indian Contract Act EPC contractor claims Prolongation costs

Preeti Sehgal v. Sarla Sehgal

08 Jan 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Deepa Sharma · 2018:DHC:179-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a second appeal challenging the same preliminary decree already upheld on merits, holding that finality of judicial orders cannot be circumvented by successive appeals alleging inadvertent error.

civil appeal_dismissed finality of judgment regular first appeal preliminary decree inadvertent error

M/S DEWAN CHAND CONTRACTORS & BUILDERS v. M/S AMAN SALES CORPORATION

08 Jan 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:150
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the recovery decree for outstanding dues on unchallenged invoices but reduced the interest rate from 24% to 9% per annum and set aside exemplary costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC recovery suit building material supply interest rate

Customs v. Juarah & Anr.

08 Jan 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:148

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Customs' appeal, upholding acquittal due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Sections 50 NDPS Act and 103 Customs Act and inadmissibility of statements under Section 67 NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Section 103 Customs Act Section 67 NDPS Act search and seizure

Sunny Jain v. M/S B.M.R.C. Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

08 Jan 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:149

The Delhi High Court dismissed defendant no. 2's application to set aside ex-parte proceedings, holding that deliberate avoidance despite knowledge of the suit justifies refusal to set aside under Order IX Rule 7 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant ex-parte proceedings Order IX Rule 7 CPC service of summons registered post service

Teleworld Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes

08 Jan 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:167-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Commissioner's delegation of power to the Special Commissioner to issue authorizations under the DVAT Act but quashed the investigation and enforcement operations for procedural violations, imposing costs on the tax authorities.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 59 DVAT Act Section 60 DVAT Act Section 68 DVAT Act

IL&FS Engineering & Construction Company Limited v. Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited

08 Jan 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:146

The Delhi High Court held that a determinable contract cannot be specifically enforced and upheld the termination and invocation of bank guarantees while directing a hearing before blacklisting the petitioner.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant determinable contract termination of contract bank guarantee invocation blacklisting

IL&FS Engineering & Construction Company Limited v. Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited

08 Jan 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:145

The Delhi High Court held that a determinable contract cannot be specifically enforced by injunction, upheld termination and invocation of bank guarantees, but directed a personal hearing before confirming blacklisting.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant determinable contract termination of contract bank guarantee invocation blacklisting

Jabbar Singh v. State

08 Jan 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:144-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Jabbar Singh for murder under Section 302 IPC based on strong circumstantial evidence including recovery of the weapon and deceased's belongings, forensic proof, and call detail records.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder circumstantial evidence recovery of weapon

SHO/Inspector Suresh Chand and SI Shailendra Kumar Singh v. Sanjay Singh

08 Jan 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:143-DB

The High Court restored the conviction of the accused for dowry death under Section 304B IPC, holding that prior conviction under Section 498A IPC satisfies the cruelty requirement and the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of causing dowry death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 113B Indian Evidence Act

Mahinder Kaur v. Harbhajan Kaur

08 Jan 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:184

The Delhi High Court set aside the eviction order as the landlady failed to prove a genuine bonafide requirement for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, due to contradictory evidence of her intent to remain abroad.

property appeal_allowed Significant eviction bonafide requirement Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 power of attorney

Kamala Chamoli & Anr v. M/S Pre Press Machinery & Services Pvt Ltd

08 Jan 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:183

The Delhi High Court upheld the substitution of legal heirs of a deceased defendant in a civil suit under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC, affirming that the cause of action survives against the estate and substitution does not imply automatic liability.

civil petition_dismissed Order XXII Rule 4 CPC substitution of legal heirs cause of action survival civil suit

Lalit Kumar v. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.

08 Jan 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:166-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court and possession is not taken within the prescribed period.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) of 2013 Act compensation payment deposit in court

Scan Holding P Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

08 Jan 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:177-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 require an honest belief based on definite material and remanded the case for a reasoned order on the petitioner's objections.

tax remanded Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 147 Section 148 reassessment

Sunil @ Dev v. State (NCT of Delhi)

08 Jan 2018 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2018:DHC:165

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant holding that prior exposure of witnesses to the accused in police custody invalidated the identification parade, negating the basis for conviction under Section 397 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Identification parade Tip refusal Adverse inference Section 397 IPC

Neetu Singh v. Rajiv Saumitra & Ors.

08 Jan 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:186

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff author holds copyright in the book and granted permanent injunction against defendants reproducing it, rejecting defendants' claim that copyright vested in their company.

civil appeal_allowed Significant copyright permanent injunction literary work director