Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Oriental International Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee discharged the onus under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act by furnishing credible evidence of the genuineness of share application money, and additions could not be made on mere suspicion or untested statements.
Bhupinder Singh & Ors. v. Amarjeet Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dissolving a partnership firm in 1997, awarding the respondent his share of profits and goodwill, while modifying costs and interest, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
Praveen Saini v. Reetu Kapur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against eviction, holding that judicial admissions and a registered lease deed conclusively established tenancy, rejecting claims of an agreement to sell and ordering criminal proceedings for abuse of process.
Arvind Narain Khanna and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-payment of compensation before the 2013 Act, entitling landowners to compensation under the new law despite possession having been taken.
Daya Chand v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse if compensation is not paid and possession not taken within five years, declaring the petitioner's land acquisition null and void.
Hukam Chand v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken, clarifying that deposit in government treasury does not constitute payment.
Krishan Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse if possession is not taken and compensation is not paid within five years of the award, granting the petitioner a declaration accordingly.
Mohan Lal v. New Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the NDMC to accommodate a listed street vendor at an alternate site to balance vending rights with public convenience.
Arvind Narain Khanna and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-payment of compensation before the 2013 Act, entitling landowners to compensation under the new law.
Daya Chand v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse if compensation is not paid and possession not taken within the statutory period, declaring the petitioner's land acquisition lapsed accordingly.
M/S Matreja Foods v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to increase interest on the security deposit to 9% per annum and decreed payment for accepted supplies, holding that proper communication of contract cancellation is essential and security deposits must be returned with fair interest.
Union of India v. Anamika Sugar Mills & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld that the Union of India lacked statutory authority to impose a two-year carry forward levy sugar obligation beyond the Sugar Control Order, dismissing the appeal.
Lalit Tanwar & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed directors of a struck-off company to avail the Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 and stay their disqualification pending compliance with voluntary striking off procedures.
Mukesh Kumar v. Parveen Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal condoning delay in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree, emphasizing the need to decide cases on merits where plausible reasons for delay exist.
Salma & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased passenger who fell from a train, holding that non-possession of a ticket alone cannot deny compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act.
Om Prakash & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Ashima Infrastructures Pvt Ltd v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the five-year contract period for advertisement rights commences from the date of issuance of NOCs, dismissing the appellant's claim to extend the term beyond five years.
A G C R Co-op Housing Building Society Ltd. v. Pankaj Kumar
The High Court allowed the appellant society's appeal, setting aside the compensation awarded due to lack of credible evidence proving employment and causal connection between the deceased's death and his employment.
Anil Kumar v. Delhi Public Library & Ors.
The court directed the employer to consider the petitioner’s representation against salary recovery following reversion from ad-hoc promotion and stayed recovery until a speaking order is passed.
Pradeep Kumr Raghav v. Telecommunication Consultants India Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld termination of a contractual employee due to project discontinuance, affirming employer discretion in contract renewal absent misconduct or breach.