Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Mangal v. North Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that claims for retiral benefits of municipal corporation employees fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
P.P.S Kapoor v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court quashed an unreasoned order denying enhanced gratuity to CDA employees of FCI and directed reconsideration with due regard to parity with IDA employees and relevant pay commission recommendations.
Taher Hussain v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court stayed notifications dispensing with interviews in JNU recruitment, directing the university to consider the petitioner's representation and pass a reasoned order before implementation.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. SURBHI GUPTA
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal in a loan recovery suit, holding that non-production of the original loan recall notice is not fatal when other original loan documents and certified electronic evidence are on record.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. SUNIL SHARMA
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal in a loan recovery suit, holding that certified electronic bank statements and copies of loan documents suffice as evidence without insisting on original loan recall notice.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. VINOD
The High Court allowed the bank's appeal, holding that non-production of the original loan recall notice held by the defendant is not a ground to dismiss a recovery suit when other original loan documents and certified electronic evidence are produced.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. KAPIL DEV SHARMA
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal in a loan recovery suit, holding that certified electronic records and non-production of the original loan recall notice do not justify dismissal when the loan and default are otherwise proved.
Sanjeev Sharma v. Avinash Rastogi
The Delhi High Court held that failure to comply with security deposit conditions under Order 37 CPC mandates passing of a decree in favor of the plaintiff without examining the merits.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. GURDEV SINGH
The Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's appeal, holding that a suit for recovery under Order XXXVII CPC is maintainable without proof of dispatch of legal notice and that certified statements under Section 65B and the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act suffice to establish the debt.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. KAMINI SHARMA & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal in a loan recovery suit, holding that certified electronic records and copies of documents suffice when originals are not in possession, and technical non-production of the original loan recall notice cannot defeat substantive justice.
Albin Baby v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a typographical error in a student's examination certificate despite limitation rules, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural bars.
Sanatan Dharam Mewat Educational Society v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner institute liberty to apply afresh for AICTE approval after complying with prescribed procedures for course closure, setting aside the withdrawal of approval order.
Prabhjot Singh Kohli v. Raghbir Singh & Ors.
A subsequent Will revokes an earlier Will only in respect of properties it covers, and does not revoke the earlier Will as to other properties not mentioned.
Sunil Kumar & Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction orders under the Public Premises Act against occupants of government land leased to cooperative societies, ruling that state tenancy laws do not protect occupants after lease expiry.
Harbhajan Singh Bagga v. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a Jeevan Shree policyholder who defaults on the last premium is not entitled to guaranteed additions accruing after default, upholding LIC's reduced paid-up settlement in line with policy terms.
M/S Ram Krishan Associates v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that a licensee with exclusive rights under a license agreement is not an owner under the Income Tax Act, and sub-license fees received by such licensee are taxable under 'income from other sources' and not under 'income from house property.'
M/S Ram Krishan Associates v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that a licensee with exclusive rights under a license agreement is not an owner under the Income Tax Act, and income from sub-licensing is taxable under 'Income from other sources', not 'Income from house property'.
M/S Ram Krishan Associates v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that a licensee with exclusive rights under a license agreement is not an owner under the Income Tax Act, and income from sub-licensing is taxable under 'Income from other sources' rather than 'Income from house property'.
Indian Optometry Federation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging online sale of optical lenses without prescriptions, holding that such sales against confirmed prescriptions do not violate public interest and that regulatory responsibility does not lie with the respondent.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vidya Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the motor accident compensation award by adding future prospects, adjusting non-pecuniary damages, and directing payment to the deceased's mother despite the widow's remarriage and prior settlement.