Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Ajanta Raj Proteins Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Himanshu Foods Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for suits under Order XXXVII CPC based on dishonoured cheques begins from the date of dishonour and granted conditional leave to defend where the defendant raised a plausible defence of payments made post issuance of the cheque.
Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited v. Malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld enforcement of a foreign arbitral award granting damages for fraudulent concealment of regulatory violations in a share purchase, affirming principles on fraud, limitation, and arbitral jurisdiction.
GNCT of Delhi v. Bhikamber
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order protecting an employee from reversion due to employer's error in awarding bonus marks for promotion, emphasizing fairness and estoppel principles.
Indian Airlines Limited v. Skyline NEPC Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff airline was entitled to recover ground handling charges at the rate accepted in correspondence, allowing adjustment of admitted dues by the defendant, resulting in a net recovery with interest.
Mahipal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court before the Act's commencement, and deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
New Delhi Television Limited v. S.K. Srivastava
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining publication of defamatory material filed in court but clarified that statements in legal proceedings enjoy absolute privilege and the question of defamation requires trial.
Rafiq Ahmed v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court and possession not taken within five years, declaring the petitioner's land acquisition lapsed accordingly.
Sohan Lal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as compensation was neither paid nor deposited in court despite possession being taken, and declared the acquisition void without deciding title.
Sarfraz Ahmad v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court and possession not taken within five years prior to the Act's commencement.
Md. Ilyas v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken, and that deposit of compensation in government treasury does not amount to payment.
Chander Parkash Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court and possession is not taken, relying on the Supreme Court's interpretation in Pune Municipal Corporation.
Ravinder @ Binda v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for kidnapping a child based on credible child testimony, corroborative evidence, and electronic call records establishing criminal conspiracy.
Ravinder @ Binda v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of appellants for kidnapping a child under Sections 364-A and 120-B IPC based on credible child testimony corroborated by electronic and other evidence.
Ravinder @ Binda v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for kidnapping a child, relying on credible child testimony, corroborative evidence, and electronic call records establishing conspiracy and involvement.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. IJM Corporation Berhad
The Delhi High Court held that lack of quantification of counterclaims does not deprive an arbitrator of jurisdiction and condoned delay in re-filing the appeal, allowing the appeal against the arbitrator's jurisdictional order.
President's Secretariat v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal
The Delhi High Court set aside the CIC order and directed disclosure of information by the President's Secretariat except that exempt under Section 24(1) of the RTI Act, requiring the CIC to examine if withheld information pertains to corruption allegations.
Jagvati Devi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court within five years, and subsequent purchasers have locus standi to challenge such proceedings.
Rakesh Singh @ Harkesh Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court delivered judgment in a criminal appeal filed by Rakesh Singh challenging his conviction by the trial court.
Priya Harshvardhan v. State NCT of Delhi; Rakesh Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of kidnapping, wrongful confinement, and extortion charges due to insufficient and contradictory prosecution evidence, emphasizing the benefit of doubt and voluntary accompaniment of the victim.
Sharwan Kumar Vigmal v. General Manager (NW-II)/(Appointing Authority), State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee's promotion is subject to fulfilling eligibility criteria including rural service and written test, and waiver of such criteria cannot be granted without exceptional circumstances.