Delhi High Court
65,471 judgments
INTEL CORPORATION v. HARPREET SINGH & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that trademark infringement and passing off constitute continuing causes of action not barred by limitation, and dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint seeking injunction against use of the 'Intel' name.
Aditya Narayan Yadav v. Aggarwal Plastics & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court’s finding that the petitioner failed to prove an employer-employee relationship with the respondent, upholding the dismissal of the claim petition.
Davendar Kumar Bhargava & Anr. v. Oriental Bank of Commerce
The Delhi High Court held that parties must be given equal opportunity to adduce relevant evidence during remand proceedings, allowing petitioners to bring on record certified copies of documents previously excluded.
Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd v. Home Cable Network Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Super Cassettes Industries for unauthorized cable broadcast of its copyrighted works by Home Cable Network, proceeding ex parte due to defendant's non-appearance.
Amandeep Singh Johar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court mandated strict compliance with Section 41A CrPC by Delhi Police, prescribing detailed procedures for issuing and serving notices to persons called for investigation to ensure transparency and protect their rights.
Central Bank of India v. V.S. Ahlawat & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that objections to possession under the SARFAESI Act must be filed before the DRT and upheld interim restraint on possession pending criminal investigations into alleged loan fraud.
Nand Kishore & Anr v. The Banking Ombudsman, New Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Banking Ombudsman to expeditiously dispose of complaints regarding refusal by banks to accept soiled or mutilated currency notes, affirming the petitioners' right to carry on currency exchange business under RBI rules.
Shri Rampal v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, overruling deposit in government treasury as sufficient payment.
Snehansu Sen Gupta v. Sitangsu Sen Gupta and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking revocation of probate granted to a step-brother, holding that omission of the petitioner's claim did not vitiate the grant and that the petitioner was not a necessary party under the Hindu Succession Act.
Harpal Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murdering his wife based on strong circumstantial and DNA evidence despite the key eyewitness turning hostile.
Dr. Prabal Pal v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the writ petition by quashing the second Article of Charge for lack of actionable misconduct while permitting the disciplinary inquiry to continue on the first charge.
Metals & Minerals Trading Corporation of India Limited v. K.S. Oils Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing the petitioner to pay withheld amounts with interest, rejecting the petitioner's claim of withholding payment due to apprehended tax liability.
Hardwari Lal Rana and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court despite possession being taken, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
Sunil Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to landowners nor deposited in court, and compensation deposited in government treasury does not satisfy this requirement.
Indra Devi and Ors. v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to landowners nor deposited in court within five years of the award, rejecting deposit in government treasury as sufficient payment.
Gajendra Singh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to landowners nor deposited in court, and directed payment of compensation under the 2013 Act.
Singh Raj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken, and deposit in government treasury does not amount to payment.
Veer Wati & Ors. v. The Land Acquisition Collector
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as compensation was neither paid nor possession taken, relying on the Supreme Court's interpretation in Pune Municipal Corporation.
COMMON WEALTH HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a public interest writ petition challenging the constitution of the Public Grievance Commission, noting the establishment of a Police Complaint Authority in Delhi in compliance with Supreme Court directives on police accountability.
M/S JAIN EXPORTS PVT. LTD. v. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a 1979 suit for insurance claim due to the plaintiff's failure to produce the insurance policy, holding that a cover note alone is insufficient to establish coverage or liability.