Delhi High Court
65,128 judgments
EX. CONSTABLE (DRIVER) SHAYAM SUNDER v. LT. GOVERNER (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service, directing the petitioner to seek relief before the Central Administrative Tribunal as per statutory jurisdiction.
Dr Samir Kumar Das v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that departmental proceedings under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 cannot be initiated against a removed employee without a reasoned order establishing applicability of the rules.
New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Poonam & Ors
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by applying the Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi principles on multiplier, future prospects, and interest rate, enhancing and reducing various heads accordingly.
New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Poonam & Ors
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by applying the Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi principles on multiplier, future prospects, and interest, enhancing the total compensation payable to the claimants.
ORIENTAL FOUNDRY PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a bidder’s tender for developmental railway wagons due to non-completion of mandatory RDSO audit at the time of bidding, dismissing the petition as devoid of merit.
Naresh Kumar Aggarwal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, reaffirming that bail is the norm and cancellation requires cogent reasons such as misuse of bail or interference with justice, which were absent here.
Trimax IT Infrastructure & Services Ltd. v. Kalakriti Interiors
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC where the defendant admitted the outstanding amount and failed to show a substantial defence, dismissing the appeal and directing release of the deposited amount as full settlement.
Tanushree & Ors. v. A.S. Moorthy
The Delhi High Court held that maintenance proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act can proceed simultaneously and set aside the Trial Court's order adjourning the Cr.P.C. proceedings sine die.
Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari v. Kamini Tiwari
The Delhi High Court held that a maintenance order affirmed by the Appellate Court attains finality and cannot be modified by the Trial Court without new, material changed circumstances.
Pramod Kumar Rastogi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's charge framing under Sections 325, 354, and 506 IPC, holding that prima facie material suffices at this stage and detailed inquiry is not required.
Shri Satya Dev Singh Bidhuri v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, and deposit in government treasury does not amount to payment.
Jogendri Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
Vishal v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination by holding the petitioner abandoned his job and the petition was barred by delay and laches.
Hardev Kaur Jando v. M/S Upper Land and Constructions Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed defendants to hand over possession of the plaintiff's share of property to her attorney based on a valid power of attorney and prior court orders, dismissing objections regarding partition.
Rama Shankar Khemka v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken, interpreting 'paid' compensation to require deposit in court as per the 1894 Act.
Rama Shankar Khemka v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken, and mere deposit of compensation in government treasury does not amount to payment.
Jagan Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is neither paid to landowners nor deposited in court, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the 2013 Act.
M/S. H. K. INTERNATIONAL v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition notifications under the Land Acquisition Act lapse if the acquisition award does not include the notified land, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Kunwar Pal Singh v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking salary payment by the East Delhi Municipal Corporation, holding that service matters fall exclusively within the Central Administrative Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Jaycon Infrastructure Ltd. v. Soma Enterprises Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award upholding a settlement agreement, holding that allegations of coercion were unsubstantiated and the principle of accord and satisfaction barred further claims.