Delhi High Court
102,671 judgments
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd v. Charu Lodha
The Delhi High Court held that disputes covered by a valid arbitration agreement must be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and stayed the court proceedings accordingly.
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. Tehmina Sen
The Delhi High Court heard a commercial appeal involving Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. and Tehmina Sen, with related arbitration proceedings under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, New Delhi v. DKG Finance & Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the income tax department's appeal as the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold limit excluding interest, in accordance with CBDT circulars.
Ashish Sharma v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court directed DDA to refund Rs. 22 lakhs to a petitioner who was a victim of fraud involving forged allotment documents, holding that DDA cannot retain money received without legitimate consideration.
Dharmender Kumar v. Yes Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DRAT order, holding that an unpaid seller's charge under Section 55(4)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act does not prevent a secured creditor from taking possession under the SARFAESI Act once legal possession is delivered by a registered sale deed.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. AJAY KUMAR RASTOGI
The Delhi High Court held that where a valid arbitration agreement exists, the court must refer parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, setting aside the impugned order.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. V.P. SACHDEV
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing reference of the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing limited judicial intervention in arbitration agreements.
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. Kashmir Carpet Palace
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing the dispute between Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. and Kashmir Carpet Palace to be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, reaffirming the binding nature of arbitration agreements.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. RAM KRISHAN ASSOCIATES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed the dispute to be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, affirming the mandatory nature of arbitration agreements.
Syed Mujtaba Shah v. Asian Hotels North Limited
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in a commercial appeal involving Syed Mujtaba Shah and Asian Hotels North Limited, referencing a related case but without detailed facts or legal reasoning in the provided text.
Farooq Ahmed & Anr. v. Asian Hotels North Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of RFA(OS)(COMM) 61/2020 involving Farooq Ahmed and Asian Hotels North Limited by referring to the judgment in a related appeal, without providing separate detailed reasoning.
Sital Dass Jewellers v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited
The Delhi High Court heard a commercial appeal involving arbitration proceedings and interim injunction applications between Sital Dass Jewellers and Asian Hotels (North) Limited on December 24, 2020.
Ajay Kumar Rastogi v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in a commercial appeal involving Asian Hotels (North) Limited, referencing a related case but providing no detailed reasoning in the excerpt.
Umang Bajaj & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR following an amicable settlement between parties, imposing a cost to compensate public resources.
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. Jaipur Jewel Palace
The Delhi High Court heard a commercial appeal involving Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. and Jaipur Jewel Palace, including applications under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the judgment referencing a related case.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. FAROOQ AHMED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing referral of the commercial dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing limited judicial interference where a valid arbitration agreement exists.
Sultan Ahmed v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in a commercial appeal involving Sultan Ahmed and Asian Hotels (North) Limited, referencing a related case for its decision.
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd v. Sultan Ahmed
The Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement requires the court to refer the dispute to arbitration and stay court proceedings under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. Arun Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the arbitration agreement and directed the parties to resolve their dispute through arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.