Delhi High Court

100,734 judgments

Year:

Sumit @ Kala v. State

07 Jul 2020 · Yogesh Khanna · 2020:DHC:2232

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for regular bail of the accused involved in causing fatal injuries leading to death, holding that prima facie evidence and medical opinion negate bail entitlement and parity with co-accused cannot be granted.

criminal petition_dismissed regular bail Section 439 CrPC culpable homicide coronary artery blockage

Sarthak Maggon v. Union of India & Anr.

07 Jul 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:2240-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging restrictions on prisoners' legal access, holding that a Circular providing video conferencing facilities adequately protects their constitutional rights under Article 21.

constitutional petition_dismissed Article 21 prisoners' rights legal representation video conferencing

Ashwani Minda and M/S Jay Ushin Limited v. M/S U-Shin Limited and M/S Minebea Mitsumi Inc.

07 Jul 2020 · The Chief Justice; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:2231-DB

The Delhi High Court held that after constitution of a foreign-seated arbitral tribunal, Indian courts will not entertain Section 9 petitions for interim relief unless the remedy before the tribunal is inefficacious, dismissing the appellants' petition seeking injunction against a public offer in breach of a joint venture agreement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act foreign-seated arbitration interim measures emergency arbitrator

Techsharp Engineers Pvt Ltd v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

07 Jul 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2020:DHC:2246
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension for the sole arbitrator to pass the arbitral award due to delays caused by the COVID-19 lockdown.

civil petition_allowed arbitral award extension of time COVID-19 lockdown interests of justice

Amar Singh Gautam and Anr v. G. Block Resident’s Welfare Association

07 Jul 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2248-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that crossing railway tracks without lawful authority is illegal trespass under Section 147 of the Indian Railways Act, and upheld the order permitting reconstruction of a barricading wall to prevent such trespass.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Railways Act 1989 Section 147 trespass railway property

INFINITI RETAIL LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

07 Jul 2020 · Manmohan J; Sanjeev Narula J · 2020:DHC:2237-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner cannot withhold issuance of Declaration Form C or block the portal without passing a reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing under Rule 5(4)(ii) of the Central Sales Tax (Delhi) Rules.

tax petition_allowed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Declaration Form C Rule 5(4)(ii) Central Sales Tax (Delhi) Rules

Ajit P. Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Jul 2020 · Chief Justice D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:2239-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld temporary suspension of physical legal interviews during COVID-19, endorsing video conferencing as an adequate alternative to protect prisoners' right to legal consultation.

constitutional petition_dismissed legal interviews prisoners' rights COVID-19 pandemic video conferencing

Deepak Dabas v. State (Govt of NCT) of Delhi

07 Jul 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:2243

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a murder and arms offences case, holding that his release would be hazardous to society despite procedural irregularities alleged in his arrest.

criminal petition_dismissed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. habitual offender heinous offences

M.C. Overseas v. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive & Anr.)

07 Jul 2020 · D.N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:2241-DB

The Delhi High Court directed Customs authorities to decide refund claims following CESTAT's favorable order, allowed defreezing of the petitioner's bank account, and granted liberty to seek release of seized goods from the trial court under criminal procedure.

administrative petition_allowed Customs Act, 1962 refund of customs duty seizure of goods CESTAT order

Jaipal Singh v. State

07 Jul 2020 · Yogesh Khanna · 2020:DHC:2234

The Delhi High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition relying on the reasoning of a previously dismissed identical petition, emphasizing judicial consistency.

criminal petition_dismissed writ petition criminal law dismissal identical issue

Hero Wind Energy Private Ltd. v. Inox Renewables Limited & Anr

07 Jul 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2230-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Section 9(3) of the Arbitration Act does not bar court-ordered interim relief for subsequent disputes arising after constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal for earlier disputes under the same agreements.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 9(3) Arbitration Act interim measures Arbitral Tribunal constitution composite transaction

Kailash v. Government of NCT of Delhi

07 Jul 2020 · Navin Chawla · 2020:DHC:2247

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of Fair Price Shop allotment recommendations, holding that statutory criteria under the Delhi Specified Articles Order must be strictly followed and subjective assessments are insufficient.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Fair Price Shops Public Distribution System Delhi Specified Articles Order Selection Committee

Raiees Khan v. State of NCT Delhi

07 Jul 2020 · Yogesh Khanna · 2020:DHC:2222

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Raiees Khan in a riot case, holding that the gravity of offences and multiple witness identifications justified denial of bail despite delay in FIR registration.

criminal petition_dismissed bail Section 439 CrPC delay in FIR registration disclosure statement

Shivani Kaushik v. Indian Air Force & Ors.

07 Jul 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2245-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force authorities to ensure timely electronic payment of maintenance ordered under the Air Force Act after loss of cheques delayed payments to the petitioner's bank account.

administrative petition_allowed maintenance payment Air Force Act 1950 Section 92(1) Rule 162 Air Force Rules

Khushi Viswas & Anr. v. State of GNCT of Delhi & Ors.

07 Jul 2020 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2020:DHC:2236

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking police protection after the petitioners confirmed no further apprehension and were provided police contact details.

criminal petition_dismissed police protection apprehension status report contact details

Dhritiman Ray v. University of Delhi

06 Jul 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2220

Delhi High Court directed Delhi University to immediately issue the petitioner’s delayed degree certificate and establish a proper timeline for issuance of academic documents to prevent harm to students’ educational prospects.

administrative other Significant degree certificate Delhi University delay in issuance higher education

DSS IMAGETECH PVT LTD v. INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH

06 Jul 2020 · Navin Chawla · 2020:DHC:2226

The Delhi High Court set aside the petitioner’s blacklisting by ICMR for procedural violations and disproportionate exercise of power, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and fairness in supplier debarment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant blacklisting holiday list natural justice show cause notice

Aadinath India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade and Taxes & Anr.

06 Jul 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:2219-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the tax authority to decide the petitioner's claim for interest on a refunded deposit under Section 42 of the Delhi VAT Act by a reasoned order within four weeks after hearing the petitioner.

tax other interest on deposit Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 42 refund

Mahesh Murthy v. Pooja Chauhan and Ors.

06 Jul 2020 · Jayant Nath · 2020:DHC:2221

The Delhi High Court vacated interim injunctions restraining defendants from publishing alleged defamatory content against a venture capitalist, emphasizing the need to balance freedom of speech with the right to reputation and applying the tests of necessity and proportionality for prior restraint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant defamation interim injunction prior restraint freedom of speech

Aarka Sports Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Kalsi Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

06 Jul 2020 · J. R. Midha · 2020:DHC:2223

Delhi High Court lacks jurisdiction to appoint arbitrator under Section 11 when arbitration agreement does not specify seat and no cause of action arose in Delhi.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement seat of arbitration jurisdiction Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act