Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Ritika Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the cause of action arose entirely outside its jurisdiction at Noida, Uttar Pradesh.
R. S. Gupta v. Govt. of NCTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of attendance records of other school staff under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, affirming the appellate authority's competence and denying disclosure absent larger public interest.
Rajesh Kumar Sharma v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Rajesh Kumar Sharma for conspiracy, forgery, and cheating involving fraudulent withdrawal of funds from RITES, relying on circumstantial evidence of his operation of bank accounts into which the funds were diverted.
Subhash Chander v. Govt of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the termination of an ex-serviceman appointed as Sub-Inspector in CISF, holding that his recognized graduation degree made him eligible for the post and ordering reinstatement with continuity of service.
Sanjeev Kumar v. Amarjeet
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the ejectment decree, holding that admitted tenancy and termination of month-to-month tenancy justified the decree under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC despite procedural objections.
Sunil Goel v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court held that pledged shares securing multiple cross-collateralized loans cannot be released solely on repayment of one loan, affirming lender's rights under group borrower and cross liability clauses.
Cox and Kings Global Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court restrained the Union of India from encashing third-party Bank Guarantees pending replacement by the contracting party, allowing retention until termination notice expiry.
CHAQUE JOUR HR SERVICES PVT.LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that partial admission of Service Tax liability does not constitute quantification of entire tax dues before the relevant date, rendering the petitioner ineligible for settlement under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme.
Shahjad v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case due to lack of prima facie evidence connecting him to the offence and the purely circumstantial nature of the prosecution's case.
Raj Kumar Sharma v. Sandeep Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that the registration of the "PIZZA GALLERIA" mark was deceptively similar to an earlier device mark application and ordered rectification with a geographic disclaimer restricting use in the district of Rewari.
Rajnikant v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order on the diversion of unfilled vacancies within six weeks, preserving the petitioner’s right to further challenge.
Future Coupons Private Limited & Ors. v. Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC & Anr.
Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging arbitral tribunal's interlocutory orders allowing claim amendment and rejecting termination, holding continuation of arbitration valid despite CCI order and insolvency moratorium.
Rajendra Prasad Sharma v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Single Judge to first determine the maintainability and jurisdictional issues of a writ petition before proceeding to its merits.
FERRARI ESTATES LLP v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court heard a writ petition filed by Ferrari Estates LLP against the Union of India and others concerning administrative issues related to NHAI, delivering judgment on August 28, 2020.
Purshotam Behl v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that under the National Highway Act, possession of land can be taken after vesting and partial compensation determination, even if compensation for structures is deferred to a supplementary award.
Dr. Akshee Batra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitrary PG medical seat allotment due to failure to advertise vacancy and directed fresh counselling with due publicity, while protecting the bona fide interests of the candidate already admitted.
Capt. Atul Chandra v. Air India Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner remained an Air India employee despite his contract appointment with DGCA, and Air India had jurisdiction to issue a chargesheet, refusing to stay disciplinary proceedings.
Dr. Navroz Mehta v. Union of India & Anr
A candidate already admitted to a PG medical course elsewhere is ineligible to participate in AFMS PG counselling and must produce original certificates as per the binding Information Bulletin rules.
MEHUL CHOKSI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vijay Aggarwal, Mr.Naman Joshi, Mr.Tarun Singla, Mr.Mudit Jain, Mr.Ashul Aggarwal, Ms.Barkha Rastogi, Mr.Shailesh Pandey, Mr.Kunal Srivastava, Advs. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking regulation and pre-screening of a documentary on OTT platforms, holding that existing IT Act provisions suffice and private disputes over prejudicial content must be resolved through civil courts.
Dalvinder Singh Sodhi v. Union of India & Ors.
The provided text is only the cover page and case metadata of a Delhi High Court judgment dated 28 August 2020 without substantive content or reasoning.