Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Baikuntha Nath Das v. Central Reserve Police Force
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a CRPF employee on medical grounds, holding that government servants have no vested right to remain at one posting and courts should not interfere with bona fide administrative transfer orders.
Dhritiman Ray v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to issue digital degree certificates through an online portal within specified timelines without requiring physical submissions, and to establish online mechanisms for transcripts and data transmission to Digilocker.
Mohd Nashruddin Khan v. Union of India; Gopal Gupta v. Union of India; Amit Pal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld COFEPOSA Detention Orders against petitioners, ruling that absence of mala fide, justified delay, and abscondence preclude pre-execution quashing of preventive detention orders.
Dr. Akshee Batra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking modification of its earlier order to permit admission to vacant PG medical seats beyond the prescribed deadline, affirming strict adherence to admission timelines and rejecting claims based on parity with other candidates.
Rahul Bansiwal and Ors. v. The Chief Secretary, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to decide the petitioners' pending representations regarding pay scale parity with regular employees within two weeks, reaffirming the entitlement of temporary employees to minimum pay scale fixation.
Rao Umrao Singh Teacher Training College v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of a teacher training course recognition application due to non-payment of processing fees online and delay in seeking relief.
Victoria Girls Sr. Sec. School v. Director of Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the government's policy discontinuing re-employment of retired teachers in aided minority schools, holding no vested right arises and the policy change is constitutional and intra vires.
M/S Ram Gopal Agrawal v. Union of India through Northern Railway Moradabad
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, affirming that the Court's role is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement's existence and leaving other disputes to the arbitral tribunal.
Chander Prakash v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and granted liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the parole rejection order.
Ashish Bhalla v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner not in possession at the time of filing a writ petition cannot lawfully take forcible possession post withdrawal of the petition, directing restoration of possession to the lawful occupant.
Deepu & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on the complainant's settlement with the accused and refusal to prosecute further.
Trans India International Ltd. v. Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court recalled ex parte orders striking off the petitioner's written statement and allowed the petitioner to defend the suit on payment of costs and with directions to expedite the trial.
S K Jain v. ACIT, Circle 50 (1) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious adjudication of pending rectification applications under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning interest demand under Section 244A, disposing of the writ petition without deciding the merits.
Alankit Assignments Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the curtailment of a contract period and related decisions by the State, holding that the Letter of Intent did not constitute a binding contract and that the State's actions were neither arbitrary nor beyond its policy discretion.
Jai Bhagwan @ Billu v. Mange Ram & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking injunction against construction on disputed property but restrained parties from alienating possession or creating third party rights pending suit.
Mittal Electronics v. Sujata Home Appliances (P) Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified an ex-parte injunction restraining defendants from using the trademark 'SUJATA' for water purifiers and related goods due to plaintiff's suppression of material facts about defendant's prior registration and use.
Ritu Hooda v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court held that termination of school teachers' services, even if due to void recruitment, is appealable only before the Delhi School Education Tribunal under Section 8(3) of the Act, and writ petitions challenging such termination are not maintainable.
Harish Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 21(c) NDPS Act, ruling that credible police evidence and compliance with Section 50 safeguards suffice despite absence of independent witnesses.
Seema Jain v. ACIT, Circle 50 (1) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the income tax authority to decide pending rectification applications under Section 154 within four weeks, leaving substantive rights open.
Ritu Hooda v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court held that termination of school employees following cancellation of appointments due to irregular recruitment is subject to appeal before the Delhi School Education Tribunal under Section 8(3) of the Act, and writ petitions challenging such termination are not maintainable.