Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Vinod Kumar Proprietor of Kunal Trading Corporation v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 103 and 104 of the Trade Marks Act, holding that the pendency of a rectification petition does not bar criminal proceedings and that the petitioner must seek stay of proceedings under Section 113.
BID SERVICES DIVISION (MAURITIUS) LTD v. GVK AIRPORT HOLDINGS PVT.LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the commercial appeal as withdrawn on the appellant’s request, terminating the proceedings without adjudication.
Yash Yadav v. CBSE & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against an interlocutory order granting time to file counter-affidavits, holding such orders are not appealable and directing the writ petition to be decided on merits.
Dinesh Kumar Sirohi & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their withdrawal of prosecution.
M/S FIS PAYMENT SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9(1) AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Income Tax Department to reconsider withholding of the refund under section 241A after affording the petitioner a fair hearing and passing a fresh speaking order.
Harpal Singh Rana v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL concerning widow pension schemes after finding the government had complied with payment obligations, equalized financial criteria, communicated application statuses, and granted time extensions due to COVID-19.
GENCON ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PVT Ltd. v. CINDA ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a contract where parties failed to agree on the arbitrator's identity.
Rajesh Kumar Yaduvanshi v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court held that a bank nominee director cannot be prosecuted for company fraud without material showing bad faith or complicity, granting immunity under Section 16A of the Banking Companies Act.
The Delhi & District Cricket Association v. Sudhir Kumar Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to company elections, oppression, mismanagement, and appointment of officers fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the NCLT under the Companies Act, 2013, barring civil court jurisdiction under Section 430.
Master Yashvir Singh Chauhan & Ors. v. Bal Bharati Public School Rohini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim order directing appellants to pay 50% of disputed school fees as a reasonable interim measure pending final adjudication.
Bhupinder Kaur v. Punjabi Academy
The Delhi High Court quashed a suspension order for failure to conduct mandatory review within 90 days under CCS (CCA) Rules, directing reinstatement of the petitioner.
Indoco Remedies Ltd. v. Bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission to sell patented Apixaban generic stock during COVID-19, upholding the injunction and emphasizing the compulsory license remedy under the Patents Act.
Ashish Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that directors disqualified before 7 May 2018 do not demit office in other companies under the proviso to Section 167(1)(a) and allowed the petitioner to file belated documents under the Companies Fresh Start Scheme 2020.
S. K. Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, Circle 22(2)
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to dispose of the petitioner’s pending representations and give appeal effect to the ITAT order despite expiry of the statutory time limit.
Major Siddhesh Rane v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Army to reconsider a posting order and allowed the petitioner to be posted with his wife on humanitarian grounds, balancing operational needs with family considerations.
J.K.V.B. Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, Circle 13(2)
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to expedite the refund of Rs. 2,80,730 to the petitioner and dismissed the claim for interest due to delay, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Alka Sachdeva v. Seema Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to challenge the maintainability of objections filed in execution proceedings on the ground of waiver and directed expeditious disposal without deciding the waiver issue on merits.
HYOSUNG CORPORATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted an eight-week extension to the Revenue Department to comply with refund orders due to COVID-19 related operational difficulties.
Khagesh B. Jha v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A and the RTE Act includes provision of digital devices and internet access to EWS/DG children for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, directing the State and private schools to ensure equitable education without discrimination.
Mukul Mittal & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the proviso to Section 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 cannot be applied retrospectively to cancel DINs and DSCs for defaults before 07.05.2018, directing reactivation of petitioners' DINs to enable compliance and availing of the Companies Fresh Start Scheme 2020.