Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Amorous Communications v. Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a writ of demand under the DVAT Act cannot be challenged without first availing statutory remedies to contest the underlying assessment orders and notices of default.
Evangelical Church of India v. Evangelical Christian Church of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expedite disposal of long-pending execution proceedings within four months, without commenting on the merits.
Binay Kumar Chauhan v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a rape case, holding that the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act provisions did not prima facie apply and that the allegations require trial for determination.
Sh. Sikender v. Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited & Anr.
The High Court held that summons must be properly issued and served to commence the limitation period for filing a written statement, setting aside the Trial Court's order striking off the petitioner's written statement filed beyond 120 days.
Jagdish v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for acid attack under Sections 326A and 326B IPC, holding that the injured witness's reliable testimony and medical evidence suffice to sustain conviction despite absence of physical evidence and minor inconsistencies.
Saimul Hoda v. State
Bail was denied to the accused involved in a conspiracy to issue fake SIM cards used for cheating, given prima facie evidence and serious public harm.
Spacebiz Solution Pvt Ltd v. Ajay Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal setting aside the Trial Court’s refusal to take the written statement on record due to non-payment of costs delayed by COVID-19 lockdown and procedural delays.
Gaurav Singh and Others v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that UPSC must uniformly accept valid EWS certificates issued by prescribed or equivalent authorities and allow rectification of minor errors, directing petitioners to be considered under EWS reservation for interview.
Dr. Sonali Badhe v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's dismissal of the petitioner's challenge to transfer orders of other officers and refusal of promotion, holding no legal right existed to contest others' transfers and departmental discretion governs promotions and transfers.
Harjinder Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CRPF constable for serious misconduct, affirming that Section 11(1) of the CRPF Act authorizes imposition of major penalties including dismissal following departmental enquiry.
PEOPLESTRONG TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions filed by Peoplestrong Technologies after the petitioner received the income tax refunds for assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19, rendering the petitions satisfied.
Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the petitioner’s transfer, holding it was justified on administrative grounds and not mala fide or punitive.
Reliance Communications Infrastructure Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the Resolution Professional has authority to seek extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration Act, and extended the mandate by 12 months considering lockdown-related delays.
Hari Dev Acharya @ Pranavanand & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of petitioners for failure to report child sexual abuse under Section 21 POCSO Act, holding that joint trial with the main accused for offences committed in the same transaction is permissible.
Hari Dev Acharya @ Pranavanand & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of accused for failure to report child sexual offences, holding that joint trial of related offences within the same transaction is permissible and knowledge of the offence is essential for liability under Section 21 POCSO Act.
M/S I.S. ENTERPRISES v. JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that a tender condition providing only preference for a certificate cannot justify bid rejection, and that consortium bids are invalid unless expressly permitted, directing re-evaluation of bids to ensure fairness and transparency.
Prashant Goyal v. Indranil Wadhwa
The Delhi High Court upheld the decree for possession in favor of the landlord, ruling that an unregistered oral agreement to sell does not sever the landlord-tenant relationship or confer possession rights.
M/S. S.H. EXPORTS v. COMMISSIONER OF CGST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking refund of input tax credit on zero-rated exports, allowing withdrawal with liberty to challenge investigation-based withholding of refund by tax authorities.
Yogender @ Banty & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
ICICI Bank v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of applications under Order 39 Rule 6 CPC for sale of repossessed vehicles to prevent undue delay and depreciation in asset value.