Delhi High Court
99,506 judgments
EX HC GD Shyam Singh v. UOI
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and decide the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court judgments within twelve weeks.
PayPal Payments Private Limited v. Financial Intelligence Unit India
Delhi High Court stayed penalty and registration order against PayPal under the PML Act pending government committee clarification on whether digital payment facilitators qualify as payment system operators and reporting entities.
Shakil & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute further.
Luxe Passion Private Limited v. Freedom Roost
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, setting aside the dismissal of its Section 9 application and granting interim relief restraining the respondent from operating the cafeteria pending arbitration.
Puneet Chohan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and obtained a divorce decree by mutual consent.
Altico Capital India Limited v. Sare Gurugram Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected Altico's suit against Sare Cyprus for lack of cause of action and abuse of process, vacating interim injunctions granted against it due to absence of binding agreements and reliance on fabricated documents.
Management of National Highways Authority of India v. Vinita
The Delhi High Court upheld reinstatement of a contractual employee terminated without due process under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act but restored the original award of 60% back wages, rejecting enhancement to 100%.
Delhi Capital Badminton Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed that the Delhi Capital Badminton Association conduct elections for all 30 posts under the amended constitution approved by the Badminton Association of India, supervised by an independent Returning Officer to ensure fairness.
Abhishek Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 70% attendance requirement for LL.B. students, denying a waiver for zero attendance even on medical grounds, emphasizing adherence to academic standards prescribed by the Bar Council of India and University.
Abhishek Sharma v. Airports Authority of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the recruitment process for Junior Assistant (Fire Service), holding that the selection committee's assessment was fair, unbiased, and based on objective performance criteria.
Radhey Mohan v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the seniority list and promotion order, holding no interference was warranted as the list was prepared under CAT and Supreme Court directions and the petitioner would be considered for promotion upon reaching requisite seniority.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ramesh Kumar Rajput
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting House Rent Allowance to a railway officer who stayed in private accommodation adjacent to the railway line and was available for emergencies, despite Railway Board policy favoring residence in government accommodation.
Management of National Highways Authority of India v. Vinita
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a contractual employee continuing beyond contract expiry without due procedure amounts to illegal retrenchment entitling reinstatement with 60% back wages.
Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the right to health under Article 21 mandates the government to expedite policy finalization and explore funding options to provide treatment for children suffering from rare diseases like Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Har Kishan v. President Secretariat
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of personal information under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, dismissing a petition seeking disclosure of residential addresses and fathers' names of selected candidates for Multi-Tasking Staff posts.
Har Kishan v. President Secretariat
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of personal information under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act and dismissed the petition challenging the CIC's refusal to disclose residential addresses and fathers' names of selected candidates.
Krishna Kant Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the condition of possessing Skill Grade 'A' for granting NOC/Discharge Certificate to Airmen seeking civil employment is arbitrary and directed the IAF to grant the petitioner NOC to join the civil post.
Vikas Yadav and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide the petitioners' claims for proper deployment and allowance entitlement by a reasoned order within twelve weeks, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Geeta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a revision petition as time barred under section 9(2A) of the CISF Act, emphasizing that unexplained delay beyond six months cannot be condoned.
M/S AMRUT IMPEX v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Delhi High Court held that COVID-19 pandemic in China justified extension of import contracts for poppy seeds, setting aside government’s rejection as arbitrary and directing extension till March 31, 2021.