Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Madan Gopal Yadav v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence despite absence of motive and forensic proof.
Baidyanath Sarkar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and decide the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court precedents within twelve weeks.
Ex. CPL Pushpendra Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with arrears and interest, preserving rights of appeal.
Ashima Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award favoring Parsvnath Developers Ltd., dismissing Ashima Infrastructure's challenge regarding rent, security deposit, fixtures, and electricity charges under their Sub-License Agreement.
Aroon Purie v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the summoning order and complaint against the editor-in-chief for alleged defamatory publication, holding that procedural safeguards were complied with and disputed facts cannot be adjudicated at the quashing stage.
Milen Ivanov Davranski v. Union of India
Extradition of a fugitive accused in pending criminal cases in India cannot be expedited unless he is finally discharged by acquittal or expiration of sentence, and bail or permission to travel abroad does not amount to discharge under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962.
Aroon Purie v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the summoning order and complaint against the editor-in-chief for defamation, holding that procedural objections and defenses require trial and are not grounds for quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C. at this stage.
Saurabh Sharma v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate (East) & Ors.
Delhi High Court upheld the legality of fines imposed for not wearing face masks while travelling alone in private cars under COVID-19 regulations, holding such vehicles as public places for the purpose of mask mandates.
Ashok Kumar Bagga v. Rajvinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's decree for possession against a tenant, holding that clear admissions and valid termination notices justify judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, and oral lease extensions contrary to written agreements are invalid.
Prafull Chand v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to an ex-Sergeant if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with interest on delayed arrears and preservation of appeal rights.
Sandeep Ahuja v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to reactivate the petitioner’s DIN/DSC, holding that ongoing director disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 constitutes a continuing cause of action not barred by delay or laches.
Saurabh Sharma v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate (East) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the legality of fines imposed for not wearing face masks while travelling alone in private vehicles under COVID-19 regulations, holding such vehicles to be public places for pandemic control purposes.
Rajesh Karnani and Anr. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
GTL Infrastructure Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court referred the dispute between GTL Infrastructure Limited and BSNL to arbitration before Justice Madan B. Lokur, directing compliance with procedural requirements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
BALAJIPRIVATE ITI v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING
The Delhi High Court directed the State Directorate of Training, Bihar, to process ITI affiliation applications notwithstanding offline submission, emphasizing substantive compliance over procedural technicalities amid pandemic constraints.
Vipin Singh v. State and Anr.
Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in POCSO case holding that age determination is for trial court and Section 29 presumption does not apply at bail stage before framing charges.
Registrar Cooperative Societies v. Deepak Tyagi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a public auction and allotment of cooperative society flats to highest bidders, ruling substantial compliance with statutory procedural requirements suffices when the legislative purpose is fulfilled.
Suraj Prakash Pahwa v. Nand Lal
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant's petition under Section 44(3) of the Delhi Rent Control Act is maintainable despite prior withdrawal without leave, as the cause of action is continuing and the petition itself serves as notice to the landlord.
Manikaran Power Limited v. Valuehunt Advisors LLP
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on limited grounds, upholding the award and emphasizing the narrow scope of judicial interference in arbitration matters.
Suresh Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR and proceedings after the parties amicably settled and the complainant withdrew prosecution.