Delhi High Court
77,325 judgments
Tushar Grover v. The State & Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 324 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties.
M. Shivakumar v. Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court of Delhi allowed the petitioner to withdraw two Original Miscellaneous Petitions and dismissed them as withdrawn.
Shivleen Pasricha v. State (National Capital Territory of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL seeking regulation of HRCT test rates by directing authorities to treat the petition as a representation and decide it expeditiously in accordance with law.
Indrajit Power Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee against Indrajit Power Pvt. Ltd. for non-compliance with coal mine development milestones, rejecting claims of force majeure and violation of natural justice.
Shreem Mittal v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging CBSE's re-evaluation process, holding that re-evaluation is a privilege governed by prescribed rules and courts should not interfere absent manifest irregularity.
Dharam Dev & Anr. v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that only a subsequently instituted suit can be stayed under Section 10 CPC and inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to stay a prior suit when specific provisions exist and issues are not identical.
Anya Malhotra & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to halt construction of the Central Vista Avenue Redevelopment Project during COVID-19 curfew, holding that the project complies with DDMA orders permitting construction where workers reside onsite and is of vital national importance.
Juj Pal Maggo v. State of NCT Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal unconditionally, dismissing it without prejudice to rights in the original writ petition.
Indiabulls Commercial Credit Limited v. Economic Offences Wing & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that police officers have no power under Section 102 Cr.P.C. to seize or embargo immovable property, quashing the notice issued by the Economic Offences Wing placing embargo on a mortgaged property.
Action Committee v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the Directorate of Education's authority to restrict private unaided schools from collecting certain fees during the COVID-19 pandemic, balancing regulatory powers with institutional autonomy under the Delhi School Education Act.
MOBILE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY v. APPLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The High Court dismissed the commercial petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and disposed of the related interlocutory application.
Vivek Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking COVID-19 treatment regulation with liberty to approach a pending similar petition to avoid multiplicity of litigation.
PRAVASI LEGAL CELL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to expeditiously decide the petitioner’s representation on COVID-19 vaccination policies for NRIs and students, without issuing substantive directions on the merits.
Steel Authority of India Limited v. M/S Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting shipment commencement under a Contract of Affreightment and affirmed the permissibility of compound interest in commercial arbitration, dismissing SAIL's challenge.
Amir Chand Chopra v. Manorma Ghai @ Maya Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a settlement agreement reached through court-facilitated mediation, disposing of all pending matters.
M/S GREEN LEAF TOBACCO PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH. VARUN KAPOOR v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS SIIB BRANCH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to decide the petitioner’s pending GST export benefit refund claim within 12 weeks, emphasizing timely disposal in accordance with law and judicial precedent.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. The Advertising Standards Council of India
The Delhi High Court allowed Dr. Reddys Laboratories to withdraw its commercial suit against ASCI with liberty to re-file as a non-commercial suit, following procedural objections based on precedent.
Captain Priyank Basanwal v. Air India Limited
The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition subject to the respondent releasing outstanding statutory dues and arrears within six weeks, while allowing the petitioner to pursue other remedies independently.
DR SANJAY SINGH NEGI v. DAYANAND MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL MANAGING SOCIETY
The Delhi High Court appointed a fresh Arbitrator after the originally appointed Arbitrator recused, to continue arbitration proceedings between the parties under the same terms.
Mohammad Akbar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused in a large heroin trafficking case, holding that the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies due to commercial quantity recovery and prima facie procedural compliance was established.