Delhi High Court
77,325 judgments
Abtar Raj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the AFT’s review order but directed the AFT to decide the promotion OA afresh without being bound by the impugned review findings.
Sachin v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Air Force's medical unfitness decision for recruitment, emphasizing the primacy of Armed Forces medical experts' opinions and dismissing the petition for delay and lack of mala fide.
Vipin v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical rejection in Indian Navy recruitment due to delay and upheld that medical fitness at the time of examination is final, even if the disability is later cured.
Anand and Co v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the termination and blacklisting of a contractor who complied with tender conditions within extended time granted by CPWD, emphasizing the need for natural justice and binding effect of arbitration clauses.
GE CAPITAL EUROPEAN TREASURY SERVICES LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed rectification of tax records to credit a disputed payment to the correct assessment year under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, based on credible evidence overcoming digitization errors.
Himani Sardana v. GNCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to seek review of the CAT order on alleged errors in cut-off marks and selection, without deciding the merits, emphasizing consideration of review on merits irrespective of limitation.
Numesh Arora v. Ms Nayyarah Qaiser
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to amend the written statement to include adverse possession after trial commencement, holding such late amendments impermissible and beyond Rent Controller's jurisdiction.
Railway Platform Tea Stall Tendered Licensee v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Railway Board to reconsider the petitioner's grievances regarding unilateral policy modifications and inconsistent implementation, disposing of the writ petition as a representation without deciding on maintainability.
OK PLAY INDIA LIMITED v. BIBBY FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Commercial Division's order issuing notice on an interlocutory application related to deposit of the balance arbitral award amount, affirming that a court's jurisdiction cannot be created by consent and that interlocutory applications require hearing before orders.
Madan Mohan Dass & Anr v. Brigadier Yellepeddy S Rao (Retired) & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld possession and title of the respondent based on a valid 1987 Agreement to Sell and General Power of Attorney, dismissing appellants' claim founded on an unproved 1991 Power of Attorney.
Madan Mohan Dass & Anr v. Brigadier Yellepeddy S Rao (Retired) & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree granting possession and reliefs to the respondent based on a valid Agreement to Sell and General Power of Attorney executed prior to the Suraj Lamp judgment, dismissing appellants' claims founded on an unproved General Power of Attorney.
State, GNCT Delhi v. Yogesh Kochar @ Babloo
The High Court dismissed the State's revision petition challenging acquittal for lack of maintainability, emphasizing that appeals against acquittal require State Government direction and High Court leave under Section 378 Cr.P.C.
Gulbabu v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case due to procedural lapses in arrest and custody despite valid seizure, emphasizing adherence to arrest and custodial safeguards.
Interglobe Aviation Limited v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed customs authorities to implement binding CESTAT orders exempting IGST on re-imported repaired goods, emphasizing government’s duty as a responsible litigant under the National Litigation Policy.
MR. SANJEEV JAI NARAIN AEREN & ANR. v. M/S SOMANI WORSTED LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that objections under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act do not bar contempt proceedings for willful violation of court orders, and even orders passed without jurisdiction must be complied with.
Arjun Ahluwalia v. Air India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that pilots can withdraw resignations tendered with six months' notice before acceptance, quashing Air India's acceptance of such resignations and directing reinstatement with benefits.
Sonu Saifi v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case due to serious charges and prima facie evidence despite minor discrepancies in eyewitness identification.
Indraprastha Gas Limited v. M/S Pawan Casting
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting claims of unauthorized gas tapping and illegal consumption, affirming that courts cannot reappraise evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and emphasizing strict compliance with Section 65B for electronic evidence.
Divakar Choudhary v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in alleged rape case involving promise of marriage, emphasizing investigation cooperation and lack of necessity for custodial interrogation.
Delhi Cantonment Board v. Ram Sharan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's decree declaring the correct date of birth of a government servant and directing rectification of service records, holding the suit within limitation despite Fundamental Rule 56.