Delhi High Court

77,325 judgments

Year:

Hajara & Ors. v. Government of India

24 Jun 2021 · J. R. Midha · 2021:DHC:1901
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court emphasized the need for accountability and formal litigation policies to prevent false claims by government officers, directing the government to implement reforms for responsible litigation.

administrative other Significant Government litigation False claims Accountability of government officers National Litigation Policy 2010

Santosh Kumar Jha v. The Deputy Labour Commissioner (South)

24 Jun 2021 · J. R. Midha · 2021:DHC:1899

Delhi High Court issued comprehensive guidelines to streamline and enforce execution of Recovery Certificates by SDMs/Recovery Officers, mandating affidavit filings, asset attachment, open court proceedings, and transparency measures to ensure timely and effective enforcement.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Execution of awards Recovery Certificate SDM powers Affidavit of assets

Dr. Maya D. Chablani v. Radha Mittal & Ors.

24 Jun 2021 · J. R. Midha · 2021:DHC:1906

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful right to feed stray dogs subject to designated areas and timings, laying down comprehensive guidelines balancing animal welfare and public interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant stray dogs feeding guidelines animal welfare Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960

Hajara & Ors. v. Government of India

24 Jun 2021 · J. R. Midha · 2021:DHC:1902
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court condemned false claims by government officers in litigation, emphasized the need for a National Litigation Policy, and directed accountability measures to ensure responsible government litigation.

administrative other Significant Government litigation False claims Accountability National Litigation Policy

Samir Kumar Das v. Union of India and Ors.

23 Jun 2021 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:1895
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the non-extension of the petitioner’s tenure as CMD of FAGMIL, holding that non-extension due to pending vigilance proceedings and lack of clearance was lawful and that ex post facto ACC approval validated the decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Board level appointment Extension of tenure Vigilance clearance Appointment Committee of the Cabinet

M/S PRAGYA ELECTRONICSPVT.LTD. v. M/S COSMO FERRITES LTD. & ANR.

23 Jun 2021 · V. KAMESWAR RAO · 2021:DHC:1894
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award for outstanding dues under a distributorship agreement, rejecting procedural and substantive challenges by the petitioner.

commercial petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Distributorship Agreement Cheque Dishonor

Vinod Kumar Kataria v. Union of India

23 Jun 2021 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:1896

The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer, suspension, and disciplinary proceedings against an Administrative Officer at CCRT, rejecting mala fide allegations due to non-impleadment of the Director and holding the administrative actions valid under applicable service rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant transfer order suspension order disciplinary proceedings mala fide intent

Saroj Kumar Nayak & Ors. v. Tribal Cooperative Marketing Development Federation on India Limited

21 Jun 2021 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2021:DHC:1893
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that contractual employees are not entitled to regularization without adherence to constitutional recruitment rules and dismissed their writ petition seeking such relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization contractual employment public employment constitutional scheme

M/S S. K. Builders v. M/S CLS Construction Pvt Ltd

21 Jun 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5967
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award on the ground that the arbitrator was unilaterally appointed without the petitioner's consent, rendering the proceedings and award null and void ab initio.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration unilateral appointment consent arbitrator jurisdiction

United India Insurance Co Ltd. v. Shakuntala & Ors.

18 Jun 2021 · J.R. Midha · 2021:DHC:1891

The Delhi High Court reduced the motor accident compensation by applying the minimum wages of the place of work as the income of the deceased in absence of proof, clarifying the correct basis for income determination in such claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation motor accident claim minimum wages income determination

Willowood Chemicals Pvt Ltd v. Indo-Swiss Chemicals Ltd & Anr.

18 Jun 2021 · Jayant Nath · 2021:DHC:1886

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to sell existing stock of an allegedly infringing fungicidal product, upholding the interim injunction protecting the plaintiff's patent rights pending final adjudication.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patent infringement interim injunction Order 39 CPC intellectual property rights

Monica Khanna & Ors. v. Mohit Khanna & Anr.

18 Jun 2021 · J. R. Midha · 2021:DHC:1889

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator in place of the named arbitrator due to serious doubts about his independence under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12(5) Seventh Schedule

M/S Anshul Traders v. The Commissioner, Labour Welfare Centre and Anr.

18 Jun 2021 · J.R. Midha

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded to a labourer injured during employment, affirmed principal employer liability, and remanded issues of insurance validity and penalty enhancement for further adjudication.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act principal employer liability permanent disability compensation

KLA CONST TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. v. THE EMBASSY OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN

18 Jun 2021 · J.R. Midha · 2021:DHC:1892
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that prior Central Government consent under Section 86 CPC is not required to enforce arbitral awards against Foreign States, which cannot claim sovereign immunity in commercial arbitration enforcement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award enforcement Foreign State Sovereign Immunity Section 86 CPC

Dr. Vivek Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Jun 2021 · Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:1887

The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's temporary appointment of a member to discharge the functions of the Dental Council President under the doctrine of necessity, while directing immediate elections for the Vice President to preserve democratic governance.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Dentists Act 1948 Dental Council of India Regulations 1956 doctrine of necessity temporary appointment

Delhi Development Authority v. Vikas Goyal

18 Jun 2021 · Navin Chawla; Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:1888-DB

The Delhi High Court modified an interim order to allow DDA to proceed with re-auction of a plot due to delayed payment by the bidder, rejecting the bidder's claim that the Letter of Intent was invalid for not mentioning the plot number.

property appeal_allowed Letter of Intent e-auction Delhi Development Authority COVID-19 pandemic

Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. v. SMS Pharmaceuticals Limited

17 Jun 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:2111

The Delhi High Court examined whether the defendant's manufacture and export of Sitagliptin Hydrochloride for research purposes infringed the plaintiff's patent, considering the statutory exemption under Section 107A of the Patents Act and upheld the interim injunction pending final determination.

civil other Significant Patent infringement Sitagliptin Section 107A Patents Act Research and development exemption

Bridge Marine Ltd. v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

16 Jun 2021 · Jyoti Singh · 2021:DHC:1885

The Delhi High Court upheld the majority arbitral award rejecting the vessel owner's claim for detention damages, holding that the vessel was an 'arrived ship' at the customary anchorage and the charterer's obligation to provide berth was not triggered without a valid Notice of Readiness, with limited scope for judicial interference under the amended Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge International Commercial Arbitration Notice of Readiness

Natasha Narwal v. State of Delhi NCT

15 Jun 2021 · Siddharth Mridul; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 72 2021:DHC:1883-DB

Delhi High Court granted bail to Natasha Narwal, holding that allegations did not prima facie disclose offences under UAPA and emphasizing the need for narrow construction of 'terrorist act' and protection of constitutional right to protest.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail UAPA terrorist act right to protest

Asif Iqbal Tanha v. State of NCT of Delhi

15 Jun 2021 · Siddharth Mridul; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2021:DHC:1882-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of bail under stringent UAPA provisions, holding that the prosecution established reasonable grounds to believe the accusation against the appellant is prima facie true.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 43D(5) UAPA Bail Prima facie case