Delhi High Court
77,325 judgments
Sasikala Pushpa Ramaswamy v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from familial disputes after the parties amicably settled through mediation and agreed to live together peacefully.
Ajay Garg v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court granted interim status quo on demolition of the petitioner's property and directed expeditious listing of the restoration application of the dismissed suit amid pandemic-related court delays.
Sunil Tyagi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
Delhi High Court quashed wrongful proclamations of proclaimed offenders and issued comprehensive guidelines to ensure due process and protect accused rights under Sections 82, 83 CrPC and Section 174A IPC.
ATC Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited v. Orion Security Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed peaceful handover of telecom tower sites and restrained invocation of a bank guarantee pending arbitration, appointing an arbitrator for speedy dispute resolution.
Sanu @ Sonu Shooter v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application as withdrawn on the request of the petitioner’s counsel.
Sunil Tyagi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court quashed wrongful proclamations of Proclaimed Offenders and issued comprehensive guidelines to ensure due process and fair trial rights under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC and Section 174A IPC.
Subhash v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to further relax bail conditions requiring the petitioner to stay away from the prosecutrix's residence, holding that the trial court's discretion was properly exercised and not liable to interference under Section 482 CrPC.
Pramod Giri v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Pramod Giri for attempt to culpable homicide under Sections 308 and 34 IPC, affirming that reliable testimony of close relatives and medical evidence suffice to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite minor inconsistencies.
Mohd Ahsan v. Customs
Delhi High Court granted interim bail in a Codeine possession case while referring the interpretation of commercial quantity in manufactured drugs with minuscule narcotic content to a larger Bench.
Allah Noor v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a narcotics accused involved in trafficking commercial quantities of heroin and cocaine, holding that stringent conditions under Section 37 NDPS Act for bail were not met.
Punjab National Bank v. NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the stay of trial proceedings against Punjab National Bank and others due to the complaint's failure to specify the exact penal provision under Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, thereby prejudicing the accused's right to a fair trial.
Barun Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of debt despite raising probable defence and that revisional jurisdiction does not permit reappreciation of concurrent findings.
I.P. Singh v. Reserve Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the summoning order against a PNB official for allegedly making false statements to RBI under Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, holding that a prima facie case exists for trial.
Ram Kishan v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death, affirming the reliability of police witness testimony and the finality of concurrent findings by lower courts.
Hajara & Ors. v. Government of India
The Delhi High Court emphasized the need for government accountability in litigation, directing the formulation and implementation of a comprehensive litigation policy to prevent false claims and ensure responsible government litigation.
Hajara & Ors. v. Government of India
The Delhi High Court emphasized the need for accountability of Government officers raising false claims in litigation and urged implementation of a comprehensive litigation policy to ensure responsible Government litigation.
Hajara & Ors. v. Government of India
The Delhi High Court emphasized the need for Government accountability in litigation, directing the adoption of formal litigation policies and disciplinary measures against officers raising false claims to reduce frivolous Government litigation.
M/S BHANDARI ENGINEERS & BUILDERS PVT LTD v. M/S MAHARIA RAJ JOINT VENTURE & ORS
Delhi High Court modifies and expands guidelines for expeditious execution of decrees, mandating comprehensive affidavits of assets and income by judgment-debtors and empowering courts to attach assets and detain non-compliant judgment-debtors.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Madan Lal Batra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for death due to rash and negligent driving, dismissing the insurer's appeal challenging negligence and income proof.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Puran Lal & Ors.
Delhi High Court formulates and mandates a Special Scheme for expeditious disposal of employee compensation claims under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, including strict timelines and penalty provisions for delay.