Delhi High Court
77,044 judgments
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Ektarfa Garments Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on a mediated settlement and granted refund of court fees under relevant provisions.
Rakesh Meena & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment from a 2011 RPF recruitment panel due to inordinate delay and held that recruitment panels have a limited life and vacancies must be filled through fresh processes.
M/S. ADVENTEZ GLOBAL PTE. LTD. v. MMTC LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the commercial petition following an amicable settlement between the parties.
ONE97 COMMUNICATIONS LTD. v. EASY TRIP PLANNERS PVT.LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed a presiding arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the original presiding arbitrator expired and parties failed to appoint a replacement.
Sarita Gupta & Ors. v. Harish Kumar Pahwa & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that non-payment of rent and non-compliance with court orders justify eviction without protection under Section 14(2).
HC/GD Vimlesh Vedwal v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that seniority in a service cadre cannot be claimed from a date prior to promotion and dismissed the petition challenging the revision of seniority date for a Head Constable promoted through LDCE.
CYFUTURE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. FUTURETIMES TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Sections 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes between parties where arbitration notice could not be served and no arbitrator was appointed.
AEGIS COSTUMER SUPPORT SERVICES PVT LTD v. FUTURETIMES TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Sections 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes where the arbitration notice could not be served and the respondent did not oppose arbitration.
Sunil Dobriyal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking seniority parity for a CRPF officer who consented to forego seniority due to U.N. Mission empanelment, reaffirming that settled seniority cannot be disturbed after delay.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 v. Suresh Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld that sanction for issuing reassessment notices under Section 148 must be obtained from the Joint Commissioner as per Section 151, and sanction from the Commissioner is invalid, leading to quashing of reassessment notices.
Dharmender Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council NDMC
The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to verify and decide on issuing Certificates of Vending to 85 street vendors holding Letters of Recommendation under the PM Svanidhi Scheme within six weeks, ensuring compliance with government directives.
Raymond Ltd v. Pret Study by Janak Fashions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes between Raymond Ltd and Pret Study by Janak Fashions Pvt Ltd, leaving all substantive objections to the arbitrator.
Centre for Aviation Policy, Safety and Research v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed arbitrary and exclusionary eligibility criteria in airport ground handling service tenders that discriminated against small enterprises and lacked rational basis, directing respondents to reframe the conditions consistent with fairness and MSME policies.
Niranjan Swarup Gupta & Ors. v. Bimla Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revocation of probate lies exclusively with the probate court under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, and a civil court cannot declare a Will null and void after probate has been granted.
Union of India & Anr. v. Anubhav Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's direction allowing a candidate to change his category from unreserved to EWS after application submission, holding that the Tribunal's discretion should not be interfered with under Article 226.
MAHAAN FOODS LTD & ANR v. CALPRO SPECIALITIES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the order vacating the injunction against the respondent's use of the trademark 'SUPER MAHAAN' after the termination of the Trademark License Agreements and reassignment of trademark rights to the appellants.
Sripathi Subbaraya Manohara v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 22, N. Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued to a deceased person is null and void, quashing all subsequent proceedings initiated on that basis.
RMSI PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that issuance of a Draft Assessment Order under the E-Assessment Scheme, 2019 is mandatory and failure to do so violates natural justice, rendering the assessment order void and allowing the writ petition.
DELHIVERY PRIVATE LIMITED v. SS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause granting absolute appointment power to one party is unenforceable and referred disputes under two agreements to arbitration under DIAC, appointing the institution to conduct separate but possibly consolidated proceedings.
Nirmal Bhartia School v. Director of Education
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions filed by Nirmal Bhartia School as the Directorate of Education complied with the Court's earlier order on fee enhancement proposals.