Delhi High Court

97,209 judgments

Year:

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S Superior Films Private Limited

19 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2108-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order dismissing reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the four-year limitation period under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, holding no failure to disclose material facts was shown by the Revenue.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 reassessment Section 148 notice Limitation period

RANI PROMOTER PRIVATE LIMITED v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

19 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2103-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an assessment order passed post 1st April 2021 for non-compliance with mandatory faceless assessment procedures under Section 144B and held that Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) ceased to apply from that date.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 143(3D) Section 144B Faceless Assessment

JVL ELECTRONICS v. SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD

19 Jul 2021 · SANJEEV SACHDEVA · 2021:DHC:2099

The Delhi High Court directed payment of a disputed sum without prejudice to further claims and referred parties to mediation, disposing of the appeal challenging dismissal of an interim relief application under the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 termination letter dealer agreement

M/ S EXPERT CAPITAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

19 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2105-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, a faceless assessment order passed without granting a requested personal hearing violates statutory procedure and natural justice, and set aside the order directing a fresh hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant faceless assessment personal hearing Section 144B Income Tax Act principles of natural justice

Trimax IT Infrastructure and Services Ltd. v. Delhi Transport Corporation

19 Jul 2021 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:2109

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that insolvency proceedings do not bar arbitration once the resolution plan is approved and unilateral arbitrator appointment by the respondent was invalid.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 moratorium

Mohd Iqbal v. Union of India

19 Jul 2021 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:2107
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, departing from the agreed three-member tribunal, due to inordinate delay and respondent's failure to constitute the arbitral tribunal.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of sole arbitrator arbitral tribunal constitution inordinate delay in arbitration

YUM RESTAURANTS MARKETING PVT. LTD. v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9

19 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2102-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tax appeal, holding that the doctrine of diversion of income by overriding title was not applicable and the issue could not be re-agitated after the High Court's prior order.

tax appeal_dismissed doctrine of diversion of income overriding title Income Tax Act 1961 Section 260A

Indraprastha Gas Limited v. M/s Shree Tirupathi Udyog

19 Jul 2021 · Vibhu Bahru · 2021:DHC:2101

Delhi High Court dismissed IGL's challenge to an arbitral award that found no evidence of unauthorized tapping by STU, holding that the alleged tapping at other premises did not breach the Gas Supply Agreement.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Gas Supply Agreement Unauthorized tapping

Snapdeal Private Limited v. M/S Futuretimes Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

19 Jul 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:2100

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining an e-commerce defendant from false advertising that its products are cheaper than the plaintiff's, following an amicable settlement excluding damages claims.

civil appeal_allowed false advertising trademark infringement e-commerce marketplace model

Keshav Ram v. East Central Railway and Others

19 Jul 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Najmi Waziri · 2021:DHC:2106-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the repatriation of a deputationist by the borrowing department but directed the parent department to consider his compassionate request for posting in Lucknow.

administrative appeal_dismissed deputation repatriation absorption administrative discretion

Harbux Singh Sidhu v. Department of Income Tax

19 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2104-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking refund of excess advance tax deposited nearly two decades earlier on grounds of delay and laches, holding that limitation periods for tax refunds cannot be extended by representations.

tax petition_dismissed advance tax refund claim limitation period delay and laches

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED v. JITENDRA GOYAL OWNER AND PROPRIETOR OF KLG BIOTECH

16 Jul 2021 · SURESH KUMAR KAIT · 2021:DHC:2083

The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement and directed refund of entire court fees to the plaintiff.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent injunction trademark infringement passing off settlement agreement

Jilu Kumar @ Jiya Lal v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)

16 Jul 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:2080

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of attempt to murder in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the possibility of false implication and imposing strict conditions to protect the investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. attempt to murder matrimonial dispute

Jyoti Aggarwal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Jul 2021 · D. N. Patel; Jyoti Singh · 2021:DHC:2097-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking free COVID-19 vaccination for students appearing in offline board exams as the exams were cancelled, but allowed petitioners liberty to seek relief for future competitive exams.

constitutional petition_dismissed COVID-19 vaccination board examinations offline exams public interest litigation

Union of India v. M/S Unity Builders

16 Jul 2021 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:2098

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim arbitral award directing payment based on unequivocal admission by the Union of India, dismissing the challenge that payment liability was contingent on third-party funding.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Interim Award Admission of liability Final bill

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma

16 Jul 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:2091

The Delhi High Court directed consolidation of multiple litigations concerning Kalkaji Mandir, appointed commissioners and receivers to oversee temple management, and emphasized redevelopment and cleanliness to protect devotees' interests.

civil other Significant Kalkaji Mandir puja sewa rights baridars court receivers

OM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

16 Jul 2021 · Prateek Jalan · 2021:DHC:2089

The Delhi High Court dismissed the NCTE's review petitions, affirming that Regulation 12 empowers the Chairperson to relax provisions to overcome State Government policy-induced hardships in faculty approval processes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant National Council for Teacher Education Regulation 12 Relaxation of regulations Faculty approval

Punjab and Sind Bank v. National Faceless Assessment Centre

16 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2088-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to grant a requested personal hearing, emphasizing the statutory obligation to consider such requests under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant faceless assessment personal hearing Section 144B Income Tax Act principles of natural justice

M/S. AJANTA INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR.

16 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2087-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST refund rejection based on fake Input Tax Credit and non-cooperation, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory appeal remedies and approach the Court with clean hands.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit GST refund Section 54 CGST Act fake invoices

Cement Corporation of India v. Promac Engineering Industries Limited

16 Jul 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:2096-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not permit interim relief against the Arbitral Tribunal's orders fixing its fees under Schedule IV, dismissing the appellant's appeal.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim measures Arbitral Tribunal fee Schedule IV Arbitration Act