Delhi High Court

77,044 judgments

Year:

Punjab and Sind Bank v. National Faceless Assessment Centre

16 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2088-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to grant a requested personal hearing, emphasizing the statutory obligation to consider such requests under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant faceless assessment personal hearing Section 144B Income Tax Act principles of natural justice

M/S. AJANTA INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR.

16 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2087-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST refund rejection based on fake Input Tax Credit and non-cooperation, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory appeal remedies and approach the Court with clean hands.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit GST refund Section 54 CGST Act fake invoices

Cement Corporation of India v. Promac Engineering Industries Limited

16 Jul 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:2096-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not permit interim relief against the Arbitral Tribunal's orders fixing its fees under Schedule IV, dismissing the appellant's appeal.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim measures Arbitral Tribunal fee Schedule IV Arbitration Act

Three C Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 6, New Delhi

16 Jul 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2086-DB

Delhi High Court directed CBI investigation into disputed authenticity of an email granting adjournment in income tax assessment proceedings and restrained coercive action pending inquiry.

tax other Significant Income Tax Assessment Electronic Evidence Section 65B Evidence Act Forgery Allegation

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. SH PAWAN

16 Jul 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:2095-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order protecting a candidate's right to appointment where the recruitment authority failed to provide timely and clear intimation of the Physical Endurance Test date.

administrative appeal_dismissed Physical Endurance Test appointment intimation Central Administrative Tribunal

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma

16 Jul 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:2092

The Delhi High Court directed consolidation and coordinated adjudication of multiple disputes concerning puja sewa rights, management, and redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir, appointing oversight authorities and mandating transparent accounting of offerings.

civil other Significant Kalkaji Mandir puja sewa rights court receivers local commissioner

Director General of Works (CPWD) v. Laljeet Yadav and Ors.

16 Jul 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:2093

The Delhi High Court directed Labour Courts and Tribunals to include detailed contact information of workmen and management in awards to ensure effective service and expedite labour dispute proceedings.

labor other Significant service of process Labour Courts workmen management

M/S B.L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd. v. Central Board of Trustee Employees Provident Fund & Anr.

16 Jul 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:2084

The Delhi High Court held that composite orders under Sections 7Q and 14B of the EPF Act are appealable before the CGIT and stayed the levy of interest and damages subject to deposit, while issuing notice to examine the validity of damages imposed.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7Q Section 14B appealability

M/S JAYCEE HOUSING PVT. LTD. v. M/S CURE FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED

16 Jul 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:2082

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a lease dispute involving alleged unlawful termination invoking force majeure due to the pandemic.

civil appeal_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arbitration appointment lease deed dispute force majeure clause

VASAVI POWER SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.

16 Jul 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:2081

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes between Vasavi Power Services Pvt. Ltd. and Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitration agreement

Ashiana Infrabuild LLP v. S.D. Bhalerao Constructions Pvt. Ltd.

16 Jul 2021 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:2094
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising under a Cancellation Agreement superseding a Joint Venture Agreement are governed by the arbitration clause in the Cancellation Agreement, and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Cancellation Agreement Joint Venture Agreement

OM College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

16 Jul 2021 · Prateek Jalan · 2021:DHC:2090

The Delhi High Court upheld the power of the NCTE Chairperson under Regulation 12 to relax provisions and intervene in faculty approval when a State Government’s policy causes hardship, dismissing the NCTE’s review petitions challenging this interpretation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant National Council for Teacher Education Regulation 12 Relaxation of regulations Faculty approval

TARC PROJECTS LIMITED v. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

16 Jul 2021 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2021:DHC:2085

The Delhi High Court set aside a property tax assessment order for failure to grant hearing and quashed recovery measures upon deposit of arrears, remitting the matter for fresh assessment.

tax appeal_allowed assessment order opportunity of hearing property tax warrant of distress

Manish Nailwal v. Union of India and Ors.

15 Jul 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:2075-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court held that medical fitness decisions for armed forces recruitment are expert opinions immune from judicial interference except for procedural errors, dismissing the petition challenging medical unfitness due to varicose veins despite absence of anal fissures.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical fitness armed forces recruitment anal fissures varicose veins

Komal Narula v. DMI Finance Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

15 Jul 2021 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2021:DHC:2062

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award against a petitioner for lack of proper notice of arbitration proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of valid service to uphold natural justice.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge service of notice natural justice

Tejswi Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. R-Tech Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

15 Jul 2021 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:2077

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration agreement in an unregistered and unstamped lease deed is enforceable and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement separability doctrine unregistered document unstamped document

Kavi Arora v. Central Bank of India

15 Jul 2021 · Prateek Jalan · 2021:DHC:2065

The Delhi High Court upheld the Bank’s right to proceed under the RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters while mandating adequate disclosure and fair hearing to the petitioner before adverse orders are passed.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant wilful defaulter Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters natural justice disclosure of documents

M/S. SHANTI NATH ENTERPRISES v. M/S. AA ENTERPRISES

15 Jul 2021 · Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:2061

The Delhi High Court held that a suit filed by an unregistered Partnership Firm is barred but the defect is formal and can be cured by withdrawing the suit with court's permission and filing a fresh suit after registration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Partnership Act 1932 Section 69(2) unregistered partnership firm Order VII Rule 11 CPC

RIMT University v. Union of India through the Ministry of AYUSH & Anr.

15 Jul 2021 · Prateek Jalan · 2021:DHC:2067

The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory No Objection Certificate from the State Government under CCIM Regulations cannot be waived by a State Act exemption and dismissed the petition challenging rejection of a delayed application to establish a new Ayurveda college.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant No Objection Certificate Ayurveda medical college Central Council of Indian Medicine Regulations RIMT University Act

Atindra Construction Private Limited v. Gail India Limited & Ors.

15 Jul 2021 · Vibhu Bakhru, J. · 2021:DHC:2072 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 184/2021

The Delhi High Court held that invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee cannot be restrained merely on allegations of misrepresentation without established egregious fraud, dismissing the petition seeking interim relief against GAIL's invocation of the performance bank guarantee.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bank guarantee interdiction misrepresentation egregious fraud