Delhi High Court
76,521 judgments
Sapna v. Government of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Ministry of Labour cannot reject a Section 10 reference on the ground that it is not an "industry" and must refer the dispute to the labour court for adjudication.
KAPOOR TENT AND CATERES v. DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the respondent revoked the arbitrator's authority, allowing the petitioner to raise arbitrability issues in separate arbitration proceedings.
Neeraj Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an adverse PPAR on grounds of delay and laches, refusing to interfere with the denial of promotion and MACP benefits based on stale service records.
R. Sugumaram & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that deputationist CAPF personnel have no inherent right to permanent absorption in CBI absent statutory or policy provisions, and upheld the refusal of NOCs and repatriation orders.
ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. SHIVAM MEDIRATTA
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate interconnected commercial disputes and held that existing petitions can be treated as Section 17 applications before the arbitrator without re-filing.
Lalit Kumar Gupta v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court remanded disciplinary proceedings against a disabled employee for fresh consideration due to unexplained delay and failure to consider all relevant facts, while affirming that acquittal in criminal cases does not bar departmental action.
Sidana Shoe Material v. Sumanglam Impex Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act does not bar suits seeking urgent interim reliefs and allowed the appeal setting aside the rejection of plaint.
Najma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a political assurance by the Chief Minister to pay rent during COVID-19 lockdown does not create a legally enforceable right absent a formal government policy, dismissing the writ petition seeking enforcement.
CDR. A. Swapna v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court refused interim relief to an SSC officer in the Indian Navy's ATC cadre seeking Permanent Commission, holding that continuation in service without sanctioned posts or legal entitlement amounts to unauthorized occupation of public office.
RISO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7, DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act for lack of a reasoned order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.
Interglobe Enterprises Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Section 144B, emphasizing the necessity of prior notice and hearing before finalizing assessments.
CIVITECH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to provide the petitioner a personal hearing due to technical glitches, emphasizing the mandatory nature of procedural safeguards under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.
Sandeep Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a serious sexual assault case, emphasizing the accused’s cooperation and lack of necessity for custodial interrogation despite delay in FIR.
Union of India & Ors. v. Rajnish Kumar
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with interlocutory orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal in ongoing disciplinary proceedings related to sexual harassment allegations and directed expeditious disposal of the main application.
Indian Ocean Energy PTE Limited & Anr. v. Bumi Geo Engineering Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enforced a foreign arbitral award through a mediated Settlement Agreement, directing decree in its terms and disposing of the enforcement petition.
Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Ministry of Railway & Anr.
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act where no contract was signed and invalidated unilateral arbitrator appointment by respondent post-petition.
CT. Jagdish Prasad Jat & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that permanent absorption on deputation is discretionary and not a vested right, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to their repatriation from CBI to CRPF.
Kiran Suresh Nijhawan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking extension of timeline under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the timeline was extended during the pendency of the petition.
Dr. Lata v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of sexual assault on a minor, emphasizing investigation cooperation and fabricated evidence while imposing protective bail conditions.
Deepak Arya v. Devansh Real Estate Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition permitting a sub-tenant to file rent receipts evidencing payment of occupation charges for consideration in execution proceedings despite delay in filing objections.