Delhi High Court
34,294 judgments
Sidharth Chauhan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Through SHO
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the Managing Director of a real estate company accused of large-scale fund diversion and threats, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation in serious economic offences.
Jagran Prakashan Limited v. 3Y3 Digital Labs Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a payment dispute where parties failed to mutually agree on the arbitrator.
EZEN AVIATION PTY LIMITED & ANR. v. BIG CHARTER PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court set aside interim orders restraining the appellants from dealing with aircraft parts due to the respondent's failure to commence arbitration within the statutory period under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sidharth Chauhan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied to the Managing Director accused of large-scale real estate fraud involving misappropriation of funds and threats to witnesses, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation in serious economic offences.
Radhika Ashar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of the internship completion cut-off date for AYUSH postgraduate admissions, holding that administrative eligibility criteria fixed by the Ministry are binding and not arbitrarily extendable.
Veterans Forum for Transparency in Public Life v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to expeditiously consider the petitioner's grievances regarding the Bureau of Indian Standards' statutory functions without granting substantive relief, disposing of the PIL with liberty for further remedies.
Anand Ballabh v. Union of India
The Court held that disability pension claims require case-specific medical evaluation to establish service attribution and directed the petitioner to file a representation for reconsideration.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant one opportunity to examine a crucial bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a fair trial, emphasizing the wide discretionary power of courts to summon witnesses essential for just decision.
GD K Jayavelu v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Director General, BSF to decide the petitioner's pending revocation of voluntary discharge petition within four weeks, emphasizing the obligation to consider revocation requests before final acceptance.
Pushpanjali Rana v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing retrospective promotion of petitioners to Assistant Commandants and Deputy Commandants with consequential benefits, following seniority principles and Supreme Court precedent.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant one opportunity to summon and examine a bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a fair trial, subject to payment of costs.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant one opportunity to summon and examine a bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the accused's right to a fair trial and the essentiality of such evidence for just decision.
M/S SHAURYA IMPEX v. M/S SOUTH INDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to grant the petitioner one opportunity to summon and examine a crucial bank official under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the right to a fair trial and judicious exercise of discretion.
Arjun Sethi v. All About Outdoor Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act despite the arbitration venue being Gurugram, upholding party autonomy in designating the appointing court.
Ajay @ Nathu@ Sunny v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a petitioner charged with serious offences including attempt to murder a police officer, citing prolonged custody and trial progress despite the gravity of charges.
Ajay @ Monu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail applications in serious communal riot murder cases due to risk of witness intimidation and pending crucial eyewitness examination.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Jagpal Sharma
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after deeming Whatsapp service valid and noting the respondent's non-appearance.
Ashok Kumar Puri & Anr. v. S. Suncon Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the condonation of delay in refiling a Section 34 arbitration petition, holding that interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts are largely immune from Article 227 challenge under Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act.
Vibha Kapoor & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to direct police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., holding that judicial discretion was properly exercised in absence of credible evidence.
Mita Saha v. Dr Kabita Mazumdar
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer petition under Section 24 CPC, holding that the suit was pending before the District Court despite an order to return the plaint, and transferred the suit back to itself in the interest of justice to avoid delay.