Delhi High Court
74,644 judgments
Siddhi Enterprises v. Rajesh Projects India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that during the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, suits against the corporate debtor must be stayed and claims filed before the Resolution Professional, permitting the petitioner to do so within six weeks.
AIR CUSTOMS v. BEGAIM AKYNOVA
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence imposed under the Customs Act, 1962, validating the plea bargaining process and rejecting the petitioner's challenge to the quantum of punishment and procedural compliance.
Vijay Kumar Nagpal v. Parveen Kumar Nagpal
The Delhi High Court restored a suit dismissed in default due to bona fide non-appearance, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 151 CPC and emphasizing the interest of justice.
Rahul Bhandare & Ors. v. A2 Interiors Product Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court modified the interlocutory status quo order over disputed properties by dissolving it with the condition that appellants must give prior notice before creating third-party rights, and directed the Single Judge to hear the application on merits.
Vandana Singh v. Satish Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the wife's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of mental cruelty due to prolonged separation and the husband's indifferent conduct, holding that the matrimonial bond was broken beyond repair.
Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Rasania v. CBI & Ors.
The High Court held that its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot override the bar on review under Section 362 Cr.P.C. and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings against the petitioner, while directing a probe into the existence of disputed videography evidence.
Charu Soneja v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld anticipatory bail granted to accused in a domestic harassment case, holding that cancellation of bail requires clear evidence of abuse of liberty such as tampering with evidence, which was not established here.
Neelam Batra v. V. Ramchandra Rao
The Delhi High Court granted conditional leave to defend a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC where the defendant raised triable issues but admitted part payment, balancing speedy recovery with fair trial rights.
INTER IKEA SYSTEMS B V v. ITALICA FLOOR TILES PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte decree and injunction in a trademark infringement suit due to defendants' sufficient cause arising from advocate's negligence, allowing them to contest the suit on merits.
Bela Goyal Proprietor of Ispat Sangrah (India) v. VIIPL - MIPL JV (Jaipur)
The Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction over the suit and that undated cheques constitute valid acknowledgment to extend limitation, dismissing defendants' preliminary objections.
Mohd Saddique v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
The Delhi High Court directed BSES-RPL to grant electricity reconnection upon fresh application and completion of formalities, leaving forgery allegations on the disconnection request open for separate adjudication.
HDFC Ltd v. Anukaran Malik
The Delhi High Court allowed reopening of evidence under inherent powers and Order 18 Rule 17 CPC with stringent conditions to prevent delay and ensure just adjudication in a civil recovery suit.
DLF Home Developers Ltd. v. Shipra Estates Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed modification of an arbitrator appointment to consolidate related disputes before a common arbitral tribunal to avoid conflicting awards.
Vishwanath Ojha v. Surender Singh Bahania
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227, holding that the Review Court lacks jurisdiction to stay execution proceedings initiated in another jurisdiction and that the petitioner’s conduct amounted to abuse of process.
M/S UCWEB MOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a transfer pricing order as premature, directing the petitioner to raise grievances before the Dispute Resolution Panel.
Dinesh Gupta & Ors. v. Bechu Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal’s interim orders directing payments by Dinesh Gupta Group to Rajesh Gupta Group based on admitted liabilities under family settlements, emphasizing the sanctity and enforceability of such settlements and the discretionary nature of interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act.
Dinesh Gupta & Ors. v. Bechu Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral interim orders directing payments and restraining share transfers under family settlement disputes, emphasizing the enforceability of admitted liabilities and discretionary interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act.
M/S ESSJAY ERICSSON PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of disputed tax demand beyond 20% without deciding stay applications and following prescribed procedures is invalid, directing refund of excess amounts recovered.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Bal Kishan
The Delhi High Court held that a workman reinstated by court order is entitled to full wages or minimum wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act during the pendency of employer's appeal, absent proof of gainful employment.
Nokia India Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(1) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to comply with appellate orders and grant refunds with interest within twelve weeks, upholding the taxpayer’s right to timely relief.