Delhi High Court
74,231 judgments
Kapil Gurjar v. Ministry of Railway & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Chairperson of the Central Administrative Tribunal to constitute the full bench as earlier directed, allowing the writ petition due to delay prejudicing the petitioner.
Mohit Bansal v. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that conviction for offences involving moral turpitude disqualifies a person from being a Chartered Accountant under Section 8(v) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and upheld ICAI’s proceedings to remove the petitioner from its register.
Sudhanshu Shekhar Singh and Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a review petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal to consider the omitted relief regarding grant of grace marks in examination results.
EX HC GD Hikmat Singh v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in light of binding Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments within twelve weeks, absent any Supreme Court stay.
Mahender Singh Negi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed to earlier beneficiaries, with interest on delayed arrears.
Ambience Commercial Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. AIDA Foods Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where parties failed to mutually appoint one as per their arbitration agreement.
Dr. Yogesh Kumar Trikha & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted a succession certificate to the appellants as brothers and sisters of the deceased, holding that minor discrepancies in the father's name did not defeat their claim under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Rockey v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the medical boards' decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit for ITBP recruitment due to fistula in ano, rejecting the challenge to the timing of the review examination and prior fitness certificates.
Ajay Dedha v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a murder case citing delay in FIR, contradictions in evidence, and weak prima facie case despite serious allegations.
GD Tej Singh v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representation for second financial up-gradation under the ACP Scheme by a reasoned order within eight weeks, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
EVAM CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD v. WEI GROW HOTEL CONCEPTS PVT LTD KYLIN
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, rejecting unilateral arbitrator appointment clauses as per Supreme Court precedent, to ensure fair arbitration proceedings.
Si Gd Jaikaran Singh v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in light of binding Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments, absent any Supreme Court stay.
Sumer v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court emphasized the necessity for timely and detailed police Status Reports in bail matters to balance the accused's right to liberty with societal interests, directing procedural reforms to ensure compliance.
Pradeep Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of candidature for uploading incorrect documents in ICG recruitment, emphasizing strict adherence to recruitment rules and administrative finality.
Anisha Begum v. Zahid Ahmed
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for injunction based on unregistered but notarized documents cannot be summarily decreed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC when genuineness is disputed, and directed interim use charges and non-harassment between mother and son disputing property rights.
Pooja Rao v. Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Commandant of ITBP's 53rd Battalion to decide the petitioner's pending maintenance representation by a reasoned order within four weeks.
Anu Rajotia and Anr v. Rita Allahabadi
The Delhi High Court modified use and occupation charges payable by an appellant claiming ownership of disputed property while upholding interim injunctions restraining alienation and unauthorized construction pending suit disposal.
M/S. CONCEPT COMMUNICATIONS LTD. v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award that rejected claims for payment due to non-performance, upholding the validity of liquidated damages and limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Roshan Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court declined to suspend the petitioner’s sentence and directed the Director General, BSF to expeditiously decide the pending applications under the BSF Act, leaving the merits open.
Manoj Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide it by a reasoned order within twelve weeks, without adjudicating on the merits.