Delhi High Court
72,805 judgments
Gautam v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case where the evidence prima facie did not establish his direct involvement in causing death by blunt force trauma, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and completion of investigation.
Pavan Gaur v. N Sairaj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed refund of a tax amount wrongly adjusted against a non-collectable demand, holding such adjustment impermissible under a prior court order.
Anuj Goel v. The Commissioner CGST Delhi East Commissionerate & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act cease after one year, directing the defreezing of petitioners' bank accounts accordingly.
Sunil Kumar Gupta v. Vatsal Mittal
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's pandemic-related orders extended the limitation period for filing written statements in commercial suits, setting aside the Trial Court's rejection of the defendant's delayed written statement.
Puran Chand Gupta & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under the SC/ST Act on compromise, holding that caste-based offences under the Act are non-compoundable and quashing powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be exercised sparingly to uphold the legislative intent.
Anjani Gupta v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed summons under Section 380 IPC against a petitioner in a matrimonial dispute, holding that the essential ingredient of dishonest intention for theft was not prima facie established.
Saroj Subudhi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that stringent statutory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied.
Janak Datwani v. Kishin Datwani
The Delhi High Court held that time spent prosecuting foreign court proceedings in good faith is excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, thus the suit for specific performance filed within three years thereafter is not barred by limitation.
Amarjeet Singh Dagar v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer of a disabled government employee from New Delhi to Jaipur, holding that transfer orders made for administrative reasons are not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or statutory violation.
Alapan Bandyopadhyay v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative transfer of a disciplinary Original Application from the Kolkata Bench to the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, affirming the Chairman's wide administrative powers under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.
Times Internet Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed Times Internet's petition to terminate the mandate of the Second Arbitrator and appointed a substitute arbitrator, holding that the arbitrator's mandate expired by efflux of time and was in conflict with Supreme Court precedent.
Ericsson India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the order withholding the income tax refund for AY 2018-19, holding that the AO failed to provide cogent reasons and disregarded the petitioner's consistent accounting policies and financial capacity.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises, balancing redevelopment and public interest with rehabilitation of jhuggi dwellers in accordance with Supreme Court precedents.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises, directing rehabilitation for jhuggi dwellers and approving a phased redevelopment plan in the public interest.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises, mandated rehabilitation for jhuggi dwellers, and approved a phased redevelopment plan balancing public interest and occupants' rights.
Ajay Srivastava v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a petitioner accused of murder with prior convictions, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence and risk of witness tampering.
Kapil Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the declaration of petitioners as proclaimed offenders under Section 82 Cr.P.C. and denied anticipatory bail in a large-scale economic fraud case, affirming the procedural validity and discretionary power of the Magistrate.
Kapil Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the declaration of petitioners as proclaimed offenders under Section 82 Cr.P.C. and denied anticipatory bail in a large-scale economic fraud case, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements and the non-entitlement of proclaimed offenders to anticipatory bail.
Kapil Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the declaration of petitioners as proclaimed offenders under Section 82 Cr.P.C. and dismissed their anticipatory bail applications, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements and the gravity of economic offences.
Kapil Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the declaration of the Petitioners as Proclaimed Offenders under Section 82 Cr.P.C. and denied anticipatory bail, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards and settled law denying bail to proclaimed offenders in large-scale economic fraud cases.