Delhi High Court
72,805 judgments
CBI v. Sachin Garg
The High Court held that investigation under Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act must be conducted by officers of prescribed rank, disallowed simpliciter withdrawal of such applications after court consideration, and set aside adverse observations against the CBI for lack of jurisdiction and material.
Phonographic Performance Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of Phonographic Performance Limited's re-registration application as a copyright society and directed reconsideration with due process, emphasizing the applicability of natural justice and legitimate expectation.
Phonographic Performance Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of Phonographic Performance Limited's re-registration application as a copyright society and directed reconsideration, holding that delay and denial without hearing violated natural justice and legitimate expectation.
Yogender Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reinstatement on compassionate grounds due to the petitioner’s failure to obtain required qualifications timely and inordinate delay in pursuing legal remedies.
Roshan Lal v. D.D.A (Delhi Development Authority)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction orders under the Public Premises Act, holding that lease expiry extinguished occupancy rights and that neither tenancy laws nor special provisions protected the petitioner’s continued possession.
Devendra Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the appointment of a candidate found medically fit after initial rejection, emphasizing prompt compliance with training and seniority rules.
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. CHIRAG PRAMOD SHAH
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions in favor of Tata Sons against unauthorized use of its well-known trademarks by ANA Realty, emphasizing protection of well-known marks and appropriateness of summary disposal in clear infringement cases.
Resident Welfare Association Budhela Vikas Puri v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL on illegal land encroachment by directing the government authority to treat the petition as a representation and decide the matter in accordance with law after due hearing.
SH VIJAY KUMAR & ORS. v. EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.
The court held that suspension of councillors under Section 79(3) requires two withdrawal orders in two successive meetings within 15 days, and two withdrawal orders in the same meeting do not suffice.
Vijay @ Bhuri v. State
Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case due to serious allegations, prior criminal history, risk of witness tampering, and expert opinion linking assault to death despite contradictions in medical evidence.
National Highways Authority of India v. IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award granting extension of time, compensation, and extension of concession period to the respondent, holding the Supplementary Agreement voidable due to economic duress and affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Alexis Global Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Oma Living Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that insufficient stamp duty on a contract does not bar appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11, as arbitration agreements are independent and stamp duty issues are for the arbitral tribunal to decide.
Anuj Goel v. The Commissioner CGST Delhi East Commissionerate
The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act cease to have effect after one year, directing the release of the Petitioners' bank accounts frozen beyond that period.
Naval Kumar & Ors. v. Commissioner of Central Taxes GST Delhi East
The Delhi High Court allowed partial debit freeze of petitioners' bank accounts and ordered release of immovable properties provisionally attached under the CGST Act, balancing revenue protection with petitioners' rights pending penalty adjudication.
M/S Pashupati Properties Estate Private Limited v. Commissioner of Central Taxes GST Delhi (East)
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases to have effect after one year, directing release of the petitioner's attached property and bank accounts.
Kumar Gaurav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition challenging LIC recruitment notifications issued outside Delhi.
Pankaj Bansal v. Superintendent of Police (HQ), Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging unauthorized occupation damages and held that retention of government accommodation during deputation is not permitted under CBI rules.
Digamber Jain Mahila Ashram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of late amendment and interrogatories in eviction proceedings, affirming the Estate Officer's discretion to ensure expeditious disposal under the Public Premises Act.
Jivanlal Joitaram Patel v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that arbitral fees fixed under the 4th Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, must be calculated on the aggregate amount of claims and counter claims, rejecting separate fee fixation when fees are fixed by the Court.
Bhagwati Transformer Corp. and Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court dismissed interim relief against order prohibiting liquor discounts, upholding Excise Commissioner's regulatory power to fix MRP and prevent market distortions.