Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Adeeeba Asrar v. All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi and Anr.

13 Jun 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:2327

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging AIIMS recruitment advertisement as not maintainable, holding that the petitioner must approach the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

administrative petition_dismissed Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Central Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction writ petition

Jyoti @ Gayatri v. Rohit Sharma @ Santosh Sharma

10 Jun 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2308

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition seeking enhancement of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., holding that no change in circumstances justified increasing the quantum fixed by the Family Court.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. Section 127 Cr.P.C. revision petition

M/S S H KHAN AND CO & ORS. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Jun 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:2314-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court upheld the exclusion of consortiums and increased financial eligibility criteria in DUSIB tenders as reasonable policy decisions, dismissing petitions challenging the tender conditions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender conditions eligibility criteria consortium exclusion

Kulvinder Singh Kohli v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

10 Jun 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2306
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed summons issued under Section 160 Cr.P.C. before FIR registration and beyond territorial jurisdiction, holding such issuance invalid and without jurisdiction.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 160 Cr.P.C. Summons jurisdiction FIR registration Preliminary enquiry

Yogesh Jagia v. Jindl Biochem Pvt Ltd

10 Jun 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2307

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against an advocate under Section 409 IPC for lack of prima facie evidence of dishonest misappropriation, emphasizing the limited scope of summoning and the need to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 409 IPC criminal breach of trust escrow account summoning order

Jayson Industries and Anr. v. Crown Craft (India) Pvt. Ltd.

08 Jun 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:4343

The Delhi High Court held that credible challenges to the novelty and originality of registered designs based on prior publication preclude interlocutory injunctions for design piracy pending trial.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Designs Act 2000 registered design novelty originality

Anil Jain v. Paritosh Jain & Anr.

07 Jun 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:2462
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that daughters cannot claim coparcenary rights in HUF property already partitioned before the 2005 amendment, dismissing their impleadment applications in a partition suit among brothers.

property petition_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 6 amendment 2005 coparcenary rights Hindu Undivided Family

Maha Laxmi Hosiery v. Govind Singh

06 Jun 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:2280

The Delhi High Court upheld the Employee Compensation Commissioner’s award of compensation to a workman, affirming that employer-employee relationship and injury during employment can be established through summary proceedings relying on circumstantial evidence and inspectors’ reports.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Workmen’s Compensation Act employer-employee relationship injury during employment disability certificate

Rafiq@Chotu v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

03 Jun 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:5990

The Delhi High Court held that a minor punishment does not bar parole eligibility under prison rules and granted the petitioner parole for four weeks to attend to his minor son's medical needs.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant parole Delhi Prison Rules 2018 minor punishment major punishment

Arun@Satender v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

03 Jun 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:5943

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner who was only the driver of the vehicle used in the commission of an attempted murder and extortion case, emphasizing his limited role and the grant of bail to co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 307 IPC Section 387 IPC role of accused

Love Gupta v. Baby @ Dinesh Kumar Gupta and Ors.

03 Jun 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2518
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the discretionary transfer of a civil suit involving the same property and parties to a Court already seized of a related suit, dismissing the petition challenging the transfer.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 24 CPC transfer of suit discretionary jurisdiction Article 227 Constitution

Baba Rahim Ali Shah & Anr. v. Sh. Atul Kumar Garg

03 Jun 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2364
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a suit seeking injunctions and mandatory repairs against a landlord is maintainable before the Civil Court and not barred by the Rent Controller’s jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 44 DRC Act Section 50 DRC Act Section 9 CPC

Sultan@Rajesh v. State of GNCT of Delhi

03 Jun 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:3474

The Delhi High Court quashed the penalty order against a life convict for non-surrender after emergency parole during the Covid-19 pandemic and granted him furlough subject to conditions.

criminal petition_allowed Significant emergency parole furlough life imprisonment non-surrender

Concept Communications Ltd. v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

03 Jun 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:2334-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the appellant's claims, holding that factual findings by the arbitral tribunal cannot be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act absent patent illegality or non-consideration of vital evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Non-consideration of evidence Factual findings

Shubham Thakral v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 49(1), Delhi

03 Jun 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2278-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for failure to grant the mandatory minimum seven days to respond under Section 148A(b), remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148A(b) Income Tax Act show cause notice minimum period to respond e-filing portal closure

Arindam Saha v. Dipanwita Thakur

03 Jun 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:2208-DB

Rahul Kumawat v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Jun 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2244-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination for a BSF recruitment candidate declared unfit due to conflicting medical opinions, emphasizing the finality of the Medical Board's decision.

administrative other Significant medical examination review medical report armed forces recruitment fitness for service

Container Corporation of India Ltd v. M/S Shivakriti International Ltd & Anr

03 Jun 2022 · Vibhu Bakhrru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:2250-DB

The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees cannot be restrained from encashment except in cases of established fraud or irretrievable harm, and set aside an ex parte injunction restraining invocation of such guarantees where no such grounds existed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unconditional bank guarantee injunction encashment special equities

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Jun 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:2283

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of pending post-grant patent opposition proceedings and emphasized the mandatory proper constitution of the Opposition Board under the Patents Act and Rules.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Procedural post-grant opposition patent opposition Opposition Board Patents Act 1970

Arvind Tripathi v. P.P. Singh

03 Jun 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2291

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a civil suit to the court having territorial jurisdiction with no objection from the respondent.

civil appeal_allowed transfer of suit territorial jurisdiction civil suit court competence