Delhi High Court
71,423 judgments
M/S TPF ENGINEERING PVT.LTD & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim stay on a termination notice under a consultancy agreement, holding that contractual arbitration clauses suspending termination pending arbitral award must be respected.
Nanda Boishya & Ors. v. Ashok Hotel & Anr.
The court allowed ex-servicemen security guards to join a new contractor despite disputes over salary and service terms, leaving those issues open for adjudication in an appropriate forum.
Alkem Laboratories Ltd v. M/S Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd & Anr.
Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to sell existing stock of pharmaceutical products despite interim injunction in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, balancing equities and public interest.
Atul Punj & Ors. v. IDBI Bank
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining IDBI Bank from publishing appellants' details in the media, subject to an undertaking not to seek further credit, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Pink City Expressway Private Limited v. National Highways Authority of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that extension of the concession period under the contract is not automatic and requires administrative approval, dismissing the appellant's Section 9 petition seeking interim relief to operate toll plazas beyond the approved period.
MR. DHANANJAY RATHI v. SHREE VASU STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to implead the Rathi Research Centre as a necessary party in a trademark infringement suit involving the 'RATHI' mark to ensure complete adjudication.
Phenomenon Agents Ltd. & Anr. v. Powereye Electronics & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the Trial Court's adjournment order but directed an earlier hearing of the trademark and copyright suit without expressing any opinion on merits.
Ejike Jonas Orji v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused of possessing commercial quantity of narcotics under the NDPS Act, relying on prolonged incarceration and Supreme Court guidelines despite Section 37 restrictions.
Brinda Karat & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court held that prior sanction under Section 196 CrPC is not required for Magistrate to order investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and set aside dismissal of application seeking FIR registration against hate speech by public leaders.
Santosh Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a telephonic interception order under the Indian Telegraph Act, dismissing the petitioner's challenge on grounds of privacy and procedural non-compliance, and held that intercepted evidence is admissible in trial.
M/S NATIONAL PEROXIDE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to take a timely decision on extending anti-dumping duty following a completed Sunset Review, holding that an unpublished notification has no legal effect.
Santosh Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a telephonic interception order under the Indian Telegraph Act, holding that procedural safeguards were complied with and the interception did not violate the petitioner's fundamental right to privacy.
Vidya Jang v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Senior Citizens Act, 2007, emphasizing protection of senior citizen's rights and procedural fairness.
Sajjan Kumar v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's bail plea in a money laundering case involving fraudulent duty drawback claims, holding that the offence is serious and the statutory bail conditions under Section 45 of PMLA apply.
Surender @ Tannu @ Tanva v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the supplementary chargesheet and set aside charges framed under Section 302 IPC against the petitioner due to lack of fresh material justifying further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC.
Ratan Exports & Industries Ltd. v. The Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a company for offences under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that a company cannot be imprisoned and that continuing trial after settlement and discharge of co-accused would be an abuse of process.
K. Rakesh Shankar Dayal v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's refusal to stay a transfer order already in effect, granted the petitioner six weeks to join the new posting due to health issues, and dismissed the writ petition.
Baljit Singh & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a non-compoundable offence FIR and proceedings post charge-sheet, holding that disputed settlement agreements alleged to be coerced cannot bar prosecution under Section 482 CrPC.
Praveen Kumar Agarwal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi High Court granted bail to six accused involved in a large-scale collective investment scheme fraud, emphasizing that seriousness alone does not preclude bail where investigation is complete and no risk of tampering or flight exists.
Davinder Singh Thapar v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued against a deceased assessee are null and void, quashing all consequential proceedings.