Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. Moviesflix.net & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and blocking orders against rogue websites illegally streaming Warner Bros.' copyrighted films, allowing summary judgment due to undisputed infringement.
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC v. HTTPS://XMOVIES08.RU & ORS
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against rogue websites illegally streaming Warner Bros.' copyrighted films, directing ISPs and government departments to block access and allowing impleadment of mirror sites to prevent copyright infringement.
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc v. HTTPS://WW2.MOVIERULZFREE.COM & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against multiple rogue websites illegally streaming plaintiff's copyrighted films, directing ISPs and government authorities to block access and allowing dynamic impleadment of mirror sites.
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC. v. HTTP://WWW.ONLINEWATCHMOVIES.COM.PK/ & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against rogue websites illegally streaming Warner Bros.' copyrighted films, directing ISPs and government authorities to block access and allowing impleadment of mirror sites to prevent copyright infringement.
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc v. HTTP://WWW2.SERIES9.IO & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against rogue websites illegally streaming Warner Bros.' copyrighted films, directing ISPs and government to block access and permitting dynamic impleadment of mirror sites to curb online piracy.
Pioneer Nuts and Bolts Private Limited v. Tuffbrace Fasteners Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using 'TUFFBRACE' in its corporate name, affirming that use of a registered trademark as part of a corporate name constitutes infringement under Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
SPP Pumps Limited & Anr. v. SP Parvathy Industries
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to plaintiffs against defendant's use of deceptively similar 'SPP PUMP' mark, affirming trademark infringement and passing off.
Phonographic Performance Limited v. Lookpart Exhibitions and Events Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a copyright infringement suit concerning music played at marriage events after parties settled, recording expert submissions on the interpretation of Section 52(1)(za) of the Copyright Act regarding exemptions for marriage-related ceremonies.
Deepali Designs and Exhibits Private Limited v. Encompass Events Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's summary judgment application, holding the defendant liable to pay outstanding contract dues independent of payments from a third party, rejecting back-to-back payment and arbitration defenses.
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Dowager Maharanis Residential Accommodation Welfare & Amenities Trust
The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising under a Joint Venture Agreement containing a valid arbitration clause are arbitrable, appointed a sole arbitrator, and ruled that limitation and party joinder issues are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. HTTPS://TAMILROCKERS.WS & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions against multiple rogue websites illegally streaming Warner Bros.' copyrighted films, directing ISPs and government departments to block access and disclose owner details to prevent ongoing copyright infringement.
Endocura Pharma Pvt Ltd v. Hijam Rajendra Singha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a Settlement Agreement executed by a director on behalf of another director without formal Board Resolution is binding when uncontested, and breach does not invalidate the agreement.
Azad Singh & Anr. v. Priya Vart Tyagi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a suit for injunction despite disputed title, holding that preliminary issues must be decided on plaint averments alone without trial.
Nafe Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under the NDPS Act, clarifying that Special Courts take cognizance without committal and trials follow Chapter XVIII Cr.P.C. procedure, excluding Chapter XIX.
M/S Jindal Drilling and Industries Ltd v. Naresh Kumar Agarwal and Others
The Delhi High Court held that non-production of documents under Order XI Rule 14 CPC does not warrant dismissal of suit under Rule 21 CPC absent willful disobedience, and dismissed the defendant's application seeking such dismissal.
Sneha Srivastava v. Amita Sinha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held it lacks jurisdiction over immovable properties outside Delhi but retains jurisdiction over movable properties within Delhi in a partition suit involving succession and nomination disputes.
Harsh V. Agarwala v. Indian Plumbing Association
The Delhi High Court held that a plaintiff's valuation of a suit for injunction and declaratory relief is binding unless shown to be arbitrary or made with malafide intent, and dismissed the defendant's application to return the plaint on grounds of overvaluation.
M/S MOS UTILITY PRIVATE LIMITED v. INDIAN RAILWAYS CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that the appointment of a former employee of a party as sole arbitrator is invalid under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and appointed a substitute arbitrator to ensure impartiality.
Ashok Trikha v. Munesh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted interim injunction restraining transfer of disputed property upon finding fresh cause of action and satisfaction of interim relief tests after dismissal of an earlier similar application.
M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing revenue instructions and communications that prohibited the petitioner ISD from transitioning accumulated unutilized CENVAT credit under Section 140 of the CGST Act.