Delhi High Court
95,726 judgments
Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that the dispute resolution clause in the Concession Agreement constituted a valid arbitration agreement, directing appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Madasu Sampath Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension to the petitioner for his past service in the Indian Air Force in accordance with applicable pension rules and binding Supreme Court precedent.
Sri Srinivasa College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed. college by NCTE for non-consideration of subsequent faculty approval, directing reconsideration in light of compliance.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company v. Zee Laboratories Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of a patent infringement suit post-patent expiry, denying injunction against existing stock but directing nominal costs and removal of infringing product listings from e-commerce platforms.
I A Housing Solution Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in payment under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act due to extraordinary circumstances, emphasizing the Act's beneficial nature and the Court's inherent jurisdiction under Article 226.
JMC Projects (India) Limited v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a CPWD Office Memorandum requiring consolidated financial statements for bidder eligibility, holding it arbitrary and violative of Article 14, affirming that only standalone financials of the bidder should be considered.
Vivek Purwar and Anr. v. Hari Ram and Sons
Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to try a trademark infringement suit and set aside the decree, returning the plaint to be filed in the appropriate Court.
Surendra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation concerning the constitution of the Internal Complaints Committee and related procedural issues under the POSH Act within a stipulated time, without quashing the impugned order.
Jagdish Pabreja v. Shalu Pabreja
The Delhi High Court held that an executing court may interpret ambiguous maintenance orders but must consider all relevant applications and objections before clarifying the date of operation, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Ashu & Ors. v. High Court of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that SC/ST candidates notified in any State or Union Territory are entitled to reservation benefits in Delhi subordinate services without proof of ordinary residence, affirming the principle of pan-India reservation.
Manju Aggarwal v. Prayag Polytech Private Limited & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted conditional leave to defend in a summary suit based on a valid settlement agreement constituting a promise to pay a time-barred debt under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, requiring defendants to deposit part of the claimed amount to secure plaintiff's interest.
SilverMaple Healthcare Services Private Limited v. Dr. Tajinder Bhatti
The Delhi High Court held that non-joinder of a necessary party is not a ground for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and allowed the suit for disparagement by a licensee to proceed.
Harish Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to a discharged Air Force employee in line with established rules and precedent.
Ravi Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Navy's medical unfitness decision for recruitment, ruling that military medical boards' specialist opinions are final and not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or procedural irregularity.
Jhuggi Jhopri Vikas Samiti Netaji Nagar v. Shri Suresh Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of a contempt petition, holding that demolition of non-notified JJ clusters does not violate the Ajay Maken judgment and that appeals under Section 19 of the Contempt Act require a finding of guilt or punishment.
Dipender v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act and IPC, relying on the credible testimony of the child victim corroborated by forensic DNA evidence despite minor contradictions and absence of corroborative medical injuries.
Ranjana Mitra Proprietor of MS V2 Associates v. Mohit Narang Proprietor of M/S Medispa Dermal Sciences
The Delhi High Court reduced arbitration costs imposed beyond DIAC Rules limits, holding that reasonable adjournment grounds must be assessed on the date sought and interlocutory arbitral orders imposing costs may be challenged under Article 227 when no alternative remedy exists.
Saptagiri Restaurant Pvt Ltd v. Airport Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a tender by the Airport Authority of India, ruling that a highest bidder has no vested right to award absent formal acceptance and that commercial prudence justifies tender cancellation without judicial interference.
Tensberg Breweries and Industries Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Carlsberg Breweries A/S & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an ad-interim injunction restraining use of allegedly infringing marks while permitting limited use of existing stock subject to security deposit and statutory compliance, disposing of the appeal without prejudice to parties' rights.
Sumit Dagar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that transfers consequent upon promotion are not governed by the annual transfer policy and refused to interfere with the petitioner’s transfer order in the absence of mala fide or statutory violation.