Delhi High Court
95,726 judgments
PM Franchise Brands, LLC v. Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed partial registration of a trademark by permitting the distinctive logo to be registered after deleting the descriptive word 'PRETZELMAKER' from the mark.
Visage Beauty and Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. Registrar of Trademarks
Delhi High Court allowed registration of the composite trademark 'GLOW-GETTER' for cosmetics, holding that descriptive components do not bar registration if the mark as a whole is distinctive, subject to disclaimers.
M/s Jindal Industries Private Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Mark
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing registration of the appellant's trademark featuring the outline of India, holding such use is not prohibited under the Emblems and Names Act and prior registrations and user claims must be considered.
Jindal Industries Private Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Mark
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing registration of the 'Jindal' trademark with the map of India, holding that prior registrations and a no-objection certificate negate objections under the Trade Marks Act and Emblems and Names Act.
Kuldeep Singh Sejwal v. Sunita Kohli
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's refusal to grant summary judgment in a commercial eviction suit, emphasizing the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and the necessity of trial where factual disputes exist.
Alka Jain v. ACIT Circle 51(1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to grant the petitioner’s pending income tax refunds for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11 along with applicable interest, rejecting denial based on TDS credit shortfall.
Rajasthan Global Securities Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 19(1)
The Delhi High Court held that income tax notices issued in the name of a dissolved transferor company post-merger are invalid and directed reissuance to the correct transferee company with opportunity to respond.
M/S IRB Goa Tollway Private Limited v. National Highway Authority of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging a partial modification of an arbitral award, affirming that Financial Close fixed the Appointed Date, denying damages for delay not attributable to the claimant, and upholding limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
Amarjeet Sharma v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court held that post filing of the complaint under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., accused are not entitled to default bail for alleged illegal remand beyond 15 days without a reasoned order, dismissing bail applications in a major SFIO fraud case.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Shyam Sunder
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a departmental enquiry and termination of a workman despite non-examination of the passenger, emphasizing that the workman's admission on the passenger's statement suffices as proof of misconduct.
Anit Kumar @ Anit Singh v. Pooja
The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction in child custody matters under the Guardian and Wards Act requires a preliminary enquiry and issue framing by the Family Court before a finding is returned.
Karshanbhai ShamlaJi Mali v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking withdrawal of resignation filed after more than a year, holding that such withdrawal is impermissible beyond the 90-day period prescribed under CCS CCA Pension Rules.
Public Works Department v. Chander Kala
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against the gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Pramod Singla v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a COFEPOSA detention order, ruling that delay by the Central Government in deciding a post-referral representation is not fatal when awaiting the Advisory Board's opinion.
Vinod Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions and life sentences of three appellants for gang rape, emphasizing that appeals must be decided on merits and remission of sentence lies solely with the Government.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Karan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rash and negligent driving case due to failure of the prosecution to prove identity and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Navendu Agrawal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the refusal to order police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi and no cognizable offence was made out without formal complaints from authorities.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Moet Hennessy India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenditure, ruling that such expenditure does not constitute an international transaction absent concrete evidence, and rejected the Revenue’s reliance on the Bright Line Test.
Nusrat Jahan v. Professor Nazim Hussain Jafri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a candidate who had not completed the qualifying degree before the application date was ineligible for Ph.D. admission and that admission to two regular courses concurrently is prohibited under university rules.
Rajesh Sharma v. Union of India
Employees under the ACP Scheme must pass the trade test in the first attempt after 09.08.1999 to claim benefits from the due date of service completion; otherwise, benefits accrue only from the date of passing the test.