Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Sanser Pal Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging bail rejection and held that police information during investigation not forming part of evidence does not attract penal provisions under section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C., and the appellant lacked locus standi to prosecute police officers under section 340 Cr.P.C.
Sudhindra Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed orders granting NFSG benefits from a belated date and directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide the petitioner’s eligibility from the correct date within eight weeks.
M/S SHRI SHYAM FOOTWEAR v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing fresh consideration of the petitioner's GST refund claim after accepting rectified information, emphasizing the need to consider corrected submissions and afford an opportunity of hearing.
Piyush Mittal v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking a vigilance enquiry against a public school teacher, holding that a departmental enquiry found no misconduct and that matrimonial disputes should not be used to harass employees through administrative proceedings.
Asha Joshi v. GNCTD of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directs the Pension Trust to release pension and terminal benefits to an employee who took voluntary retirement under Rule 48-A of the CCS Pension Rules, affirming the Trust's liability as per the Division Bench judgment in Tata Power (2016).
Tanishka Maheshwari v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CBSE to correct the father's name in the petitioner’s certificates to reflect her biological father, affirming the right to identity consistent with public documents.
Narender Kumar v. The Mgmt. of M/s Maman Chand Ramji Das
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award dismissing the petitioner's claim of employment and illegal termination, holding that expert handwriting opinion based on xerox copies is unreliable and that the petitioner failed to prove employer-employee relationship.
Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd v. Ozone Research & Applications (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the MSMED Act provisions override contractual jurisdiction clauses, and the seat of arbitration under the MSMED Act is at the Facilitation Council's location, rendering the Delhi Court petition challenging the award not maintainable.
Master Medhansh Jhawar v. Rajesh Bhushan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed government funding and efficient administration for clinical trials and free treatment of children suffering from rare diseases, emphasizing the State's obligation to support indigenous therapy development and timely medicine procurement.
Neharika Gurnani v. Rameshwar Gopal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to set aside a consent decree on the ground of limitation, holding that such applications must be filed within the prescribed period under the Limitation Act, 1963.
LT Foods Limited v. Saraswati Trading Company
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to set aside an ex parte decree, holding that actual notice of hearing and sufficient time to appear preclude setting aside on grounds of irregular summons service under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
National Highway Authority of India v. KNR Construction Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 filed beyond the statutory limitation period with fundamental procedural defects is barred by limitation and dismissed the petition and condonation applications.
Ambrosia Corner House Private Limited v. Hangro S Foods
The Delhi High Court held that a petition challenging an arbitral award filed within the extended limitation period including summer vacation is maintainable despite procedural defects in initial filing.
Delhi Development Authority v. M/s Swastic Construction Co
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review application challenging arbitral award claims on compensation for delay, holding that responsibility for delay is arbitrable and excepted matters relate only to quantification of damages.
Wazirpur Bartan Nirmata Sangh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed coordinated action by MCD and local police to remove encroachments and prevent fresh illegal constructions on a public road, emphasizing strict compliance with court orders and timelines.
Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Ltd. v. Rajshekhar Construction Pvt Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 petition lacking a copy of the arbitral award and Statement of Truth is a non est filing, rendering the petition barred by limitation and liable to be dismissed.
Jagdish Chanderbhutani v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal and remanded the matter to extend the succession certificate to include debts and securities of Late Smt. Kaushal Bhutani under Section 376 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Union of India v. M/S Indian Agro Marketing Cooperative Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award invalidating the invocation of a Bank Guarantee without proof of loss in an impossible-to-perform contract and dismissed the Union of India's appeal.
Jerry Akubueze Nwama v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused under the NDPS Act after prolonged pre-trial detention, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial and procedural safeguards under the Act.
M/S RAJ CHAWLA AND CO. STOCK AND SHARE BROKERS v. M/S NINE MEDIA AND INFORMATION SERVICES LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of a substitute arbitrator, holding that the arbitral tribunal's mandate had expired under Section 29A due to non-compliance with prescribed timelines and that the appointment must follow the arbitration agreement's procedure.