Delhi High Court
61,904 judgments
Sohan Lal Sharma v. Shiv Mandir & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the interim injunction application to prevent dispossession and ensure the suit's remedy is not rendered futile.
Ruksana Bano & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte vesting order under the DLR Act as without jurisdiction after the land was urbanized by DDA notification, holding such orders violate natural justice and are nullities.
Public Work Department v. Mukesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by the non-extendable 120-day limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Delhi Police v. Mahesh Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld that the 2% ex-Servicemen reservation under Tripura Recruitment Rules applies to total vacancies as a horizontal reservation, entitling the sole ex-Serviceman candidate to appointment.
Kapil & Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Vipin Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that sexual intercourse with a minor under 18 years constitutes rape irrespective of consent, ordered framing of charges under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Section 4, but quashed kidnapping charges due to lack of inducement.
Joginder Chadha v. Vishnu Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to lead evidence post-pandemic with conditions, emphasizing leniency during COVID-19 but upholding procedural discipline thereafter.
Sunil Kumar v. Som Nath & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the employer’s appeal under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, upholding the award of death compensation to the deceased worker’s claimant, emphasizing the limited scope of appeal to substantial questions of law.
Rahul Dayaram Bhashakar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF authority to decide the petitioner's pending representation on seniority correction within eight weeks and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Rikon Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by recording a binding settlement wherein the defendant ceased use of infringing marks and acknowledged the plaintiff's exclusive rights.
Bhoop Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that the 3rd MACP under the MACP scheme is payable only after 30 years of service, dismissing the petitioner's claim for earlier benefit based on withdrawn departmental clarifications.
Sanjeev Kakar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR under Section 406 IPC, holding that a prima facie case of criminal breach of trust was made out against the petitioner for retaining company property after resignation.
Pradeep Verma v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to consider the petitioner's explanation and bank statement in reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding alleged undisclosed property purchase.
Ravindra Bishnoi v. National Testing Agency and Another
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of a student's admission for choosing a CUET subject closely related to his Class XII subject and directed admission in the next academic year due to concluded admission process.
Babu Lal Jain v. Jagmohan
The Delhi High Court directed the Rent Controller to promptly dispose of a long-pending leave to defend application in a rent control matter, citing undue delay and prejudice to the petitioner.
Sh. M.S. Tomar v. National Commission for Scheduled Castes & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that compassionate allowance under Bank of India Pension Regulations is only available to pension-eligible employees dismissed from service, and a Provident Fund optee dismissed employee is not entitled to such allowance.
Jai Singh v. L C Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon an alternative handwriting expert after the original experts expired, quashing the trial court's dismissal of the application.
Dr. Ritu Chowdhary v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the college and government authorities to dispose of the petitioner’s pending salary arrears representations by a reasoned order within six weeks, ensuring protection of her service benefits rights.
Ajay Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to Ajay Kumar in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case related to the Amrapali Platinum project, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and that prolonged pre-trial detention without framing charges violates fundamental rights.
Iqbal Singh v. Additional District Magistrate
The Delhi High Court directed officials to produce missing case files and affidavits explaining record-keeping lapses, emphasizing the duty of public authorities to preserve and provide access to official records.