Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Prem Chand v. Government of N.C.T. Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the immediate release of terminal benefits to a retired teacher, holding that financial constraints do not justify withholding earned retiral dues.
Kundan Lal Mahesh Chand v. Padam Chand Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order based on bona fide requirement under the DRC Act, ruling that earlier withdrawal of eviction petition does not bar fresh proceedings and unsupported tenant claims of alternative accommodation do not raise triable issues.
Niranjan Majumdar v. Tejpal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte eviction order as premature, holding that the Supreme Court's pandemic orders excluding limitation periods apply to the filing of leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Babu Ram Gupta v. Chander Prakash
Delhi High Court held that a tenant cannot dispute landlord's ownership once landlord-tenant relationship is admitted, upheld landlord's bonafide requirement for eviction, and allowed eviction with six months' stay.
Tapas Chatterjee v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld refusal of a patent application for a process recovering potassium sulphate, holding it non-patentable under Section 3(d) and lacking inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, 1970.
M/S. DEWAN CHAND v. M/S B.P.T.P. LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking substitution of an appointed arbitrator, holding that Section 11 of the Arbitration Act does not permit such substitution without valid termination of the arbitrator's mandate.
M/S DEWAN CHAND v. M/S B.P.T.P.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking substitution of an arbitrator appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court lacks jurisdiction to replace an arbitrator without cogent reasons or termination of mandate.
Sh. Siddhant Shangle v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes between the petitioner and Government of NCT of Delhi.
Anarock Property Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Guru Raghavendra Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent failed to respond to the notice for appointment, thereby facilitating arbitration of the contractual dispute.
Shobhana Gupta v. Atlas Cycles Haryana Ltd
In absence of a written arbitration agreement, a Section 11 petition for appointment of arbitrator under the Arbitration Act is not maintainable despite MSMED Act provisions deeming arbitration agreement post failed conciliation.
Deepak Sharma v. Cholamandalam MS Gen Ins Co
The Delhi High Court set aside a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award for prematurely closing the claimant's evidence on the first date fixed without considering his pending medical examination application, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.
Savita Gulati v. Directorate of Education & Anr.
Delhi High Court directs government to pay gratuity to part-time vocational teachers in accordance with the Payment of Gratuity Act and prior binding judgments.
Dev Dutt Sharma v. Managing Society National Public School and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed recognized private school respondents to pay arrears of salary and benefits under the 7th Pay Commission to the legal heirs of a deceased employee, affirming entitlement under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.
Oil India Limited v. Techno Canada Inc.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Oil India Limited's review petition, upholding the arbitral award's quantification of damages based on contractual standby and rental charges, holding it did not violate the fundamental policy of Indian law.
Mohd Saleem v. Zaheer Ahmad
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the tenant on the landlord's bona fide business requirement, rejecting tenant's claims of alternative accommodation and pagri payment as insufficient to raise triable issues.
Deepak alias Raj v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on last seen evidence, forensic DNA analysis, and circumstantial evidence, rejecting the appellant's false alibi and claims of false implication.
M/S BALAJI EXIM v. COMMISSIONER, CGST AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a bona fide purchaser who has paid for and exported goods cannot be denied GST refund on suspicion of supplier fraud without conclusive evidence.
Geeta Tandon v. Anil Gomber
The Delhi High Court held that in a partition suit, the civil court can examine the validity of Wills even without probate, and the plaintiff sister is entitled to one-third share in the property as the defendants failed to prove the Wills' genuineness.
Anuj Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed excluded meritorious wrestlers to participate in the Asian Championship 2023 trials, holding that arbitrary eligibility criteria causing irreparable prejudice must yield to fairness and merit-based selection.
M/S Nathu Ram Gupta and Co v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court quashed the blacklisting of a contractor for non-compliance with natural justice, holding that prior notice and opportunity of hearing are mandatory before removal from approved contractor lists.