Delhi High Court

61,904 judgments

Year:

Campus Activewear Limited v. Rama Shankar Garg & Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:1690

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s interlocutory injunction application in a trademark dispute, holding that defendants’ prior use of the mark “CAMPS” precludes a prima facie case of infringement or passing off.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off prior user rights interlocutory injunction

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Jogi Veko & Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2023:DHC:1758

The Delhi High Court set aside an Employees’ Compensation order for denying the insurance company an opportunity to contest liability, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with procedural fairness.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Section 30 insurance liability natural justice

Inderjeet Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:1719
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court directs timely convening of Departmental Promotion Committee to consider petitioner for promotion to Principal post, emphasizing adherence to DoPT guidelines and employee rights.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee DPC timely promotion Government Aided School

WENDYS RESTAURANT v. STATE GNCT OF DELHI

07 Mar 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:1955

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 336 and 304A IPC based on a voluntary compromise between parties in an accidental death case, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 336 IPC Section 304A IPC compromise

Anubhav Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Mar 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:1953

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a private altercation between neighbors following an amicable settlement and directed the accused to perform social service.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement private dispute

Vikram Singh and Inderdeep Singh v. Delhi Development Authority

07 Mar 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:1822
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the DDA's review petition for lack of error apparent on record or new evidence, affirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Review Petition Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Article 226 Constitution Restoration of Lease

P. Padmanabha Rao v. Union of India

07 Mar 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:1770

The Delhi High Court held that the Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers is a private society not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 as it does not qualify as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India Societies Registration Act 1860 State under Article 12

Deep Chand Lunia & Anr. v. Akhil Garg

07 Mar 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:1858

The Delhi High Court held that a written statement filed within the extended 120-day period and accompanied by a signed affidavit cannot be struck off record for absence of signatures, which is a curable irregularity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Order VI Rule 15 CPC curable irregularity

Anil Anand & Anr. v. Tripta Chawla & Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:1857

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of pleadings to place on record a pending writ petition as a subsequent event during the pendency of a civil suit, modifying the trial court's order dismissing such application.

civil appeal_allowed Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings subsequent events writ petition

Mahender Singh v. Union of India

07 Mar 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1745-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition seeking 3rd MACP benefits and promotion after the respondents granted the reliefs sought.

administrative petition_dismissed 3rd MACP promotion writ petition infructuous petition

Sukam Systems Private Limited v. Lithium Power Energy Private Limited

07 Mar 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:1744

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against the defendant for infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks "Su-Kam" and related marks, accepting the defendant's undertaking to cease use and withdraw its trademark application.

civil appeal_allowed Trademark infringement Passing off Trade Marks Act 1999 Permanent injunction

Kuldeep Singh Hooda v. Narender Mehlawat & Others

07 Mar 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:1741

The Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition against an order disposing a first appeal as not pressed, holding that such orders are final and not subject to review absent grounds like new evidence or error apparent on record.

civil petition_dismissed Significant review petition Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC appeal not pressed finality of orders

M/S Parity Infotech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

07 Mar 2023 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:1731-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that blocking Input Tax Credit without tangible reasons and issuing show cause notices mechanically under Section 74 CGST Act violates statutory provisions and quashed the impugned orders and instructions.

tax petition_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Rule 86A CGST Rules Section 74 CGST Act reason to believe

Shivedesh Sharma & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Mar 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:1718

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking enforcement of EWS reservation in recruitment as not maintainable, directing petitioners to approach the appropriate forum.

constitutional petition_dismissed EWS reservation Writ petition Article 226 Maintainability

HDFC Bank Ltd v. Tour N Travel India

07 Mar 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:1807

The Delhi High Court held that a Trial Court cannot close a party's right to lead evidence without reasons and granted a final opportunity to the petitioner to examine one witness subject to costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant right to lead evidence fair trial closure of evidence trial court discretion

Brijesh Kumar Agarwal and Ors. v. IFCI Factors Limited and Anr.

07 Mar 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:1795-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a suo moto summary judgment in a commercial summary suit, holding that summary judgment under Order XIII-A CPC does not apply to suits originally filed under Order XXXVII and emphasizing strict compliance with procedural safeguards.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC Order XXXVII CPC Commercial Courts Act, 2015

Babita & Ors. v. Sh Krishan Pal & Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Rekha Palli · 2023:DHC:1754

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the motor accident claim for fresh adjudication, holding that a disputed settlement signed under mistaken belief does not bar compensation claims by the widow and minor children.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation Panchayati Settlement compromise agreement

CT.(GD) Sudhir Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:1747-DB

The Delhi High Court directed examination of a key witness before considering leave during a departmental inquiry and disposed of the writ petition challenging suspension and leave denial.

administrative other departmental inquiry suspension order leave during inquiry speaking order

Ajit Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · W.P.(C) 9761/2017

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking pension and retirement benefits after respondents stated all dues were paid, granting liberty to the petitioner's legal heirs to approach respondents if any dues remain.

administrative other pension fixation 3rd MACP gratuity Provident Fund

Malavika Siddhartha Hegde & Ors. v. Naresh Nagpal & Ors.

07 Mar 2023 · Yashwant Varma · 2023:DHC:1667

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interim order restraining heirs from alienating assets, holding that the disputed MOU constituted a valid spot delivery contract and not an illegal forward contract under the Securities Contracts Regulation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Securities Contracts Regulation Act, 1956 spot delivery contract forward contract